Clarification on Shallow Water Wave Equation

AI Thread Summary
The speed of shallow water waves can be derived using the relationship c^2 = gh, where g is the acceleration due to gravity and h is the water depth. The derivation employs Bernoulli's theorem and the continuity equation in a reference frame moving with the wave. By applying these principles, the equations reveal that the change in wave speed (δV) is related to the wave height (a) and the water depth (h). The continuity equation indicates that hδV = aV, allowing for simplification. Ultimately, this leads to the conclusion that V^2 = gh, confirming the relationship between wave speed and water depth.
poilop
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I know that we can find the speed of the wave in shallow water by:
c^2 = gh
but how do we derive it?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
We derive this using Bernoulli theorem and continuity equation.
In the reference frame which is moving along with the wave:
Bernoulli theorem:
\frac{V^2}{2}+gh=\frac{(V-\delta V)}{2}+g(h+a)
continuity equation:
Vh=(V-\delta V)(h+a)
where V is the speed of the wave, \delta V is a drop of the speed in the water where its level grows from the normal h to h+a
We suppose that h<\lambda where \lambda is a wavelength.
Form the second equation one has
h \delta V = a V (*)
(a \delta V is very very small). Then from the fiirst we get [(\delta V)^2 is also very small, so we ignore it]:
V \delta V = ga and with (*) one has
V^2=gh
 
Last edited:
awesome,
thank you
 
Thread 'Is 'Velocity of Transport' a Recognized Term in English Mechanics Literature?'
Here are two fragments from Banach's monograph in Mechanics I have never seen the term <<velocity of transport>> in English texts. Actually I have never seen this term being named somehow in English. This term has a name in Russian books. I looked through the original Banach's text in Polish and there is a Polish name for this term. It is a little bit surprising that the Polish name differs from the Russian one and also differs from this English translation. My question is: Is there...
This has been discussed many times on PF, and will likely come up again, so the video might come handy. Previous threads: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/is-a-treadmill-incline-just-a-marketing-gimmick.937725/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/work-done-running-on-an-inclined-treadmill.927825/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/how-do-we-calculate-the-energy-we-used-to-do-something.1052162/
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
Back
Top