Class 1 Lever Experiment: Wrong results

AI Thread Summary
The experiment using a 30 cm ruler as a lever did not yield results that matched the theoretical equation due to several factors affecting the measurements. Key issues include the need to accurately measure distances from the fulcrum rather than simply using ruler markings, which can lead to discrepancies in calculating load arm and effort distance. Additionally, the weight of the ruler itself must be considered if not using the midpoint as the fulcrum, complicating calculations. Variations in ruler length, particularly in different measurement systems, can also introduce errors. Properly accounting for these factors is essential for achieving results that align with theoretical expectations.
SkyStinger
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hey guys, I really need help with this, I do not understand what I did wrong in this experiment.

I had a 30 cm ruler as a beam and some weights of 50 grams, 5 grams and 25 grams. I had a fulcrum which was 17 cm high. As you can see I only have measurements in 50, 5 and 25 grams. So I cut out some random paper, scrunched them into balls to make my lever balance at different lengths.

However, the results the made my lever balance did not match the results I got from the equation:

Effort force = Load force x load arm / effort distance.

Could someone please tell some factors that affected my experiment results and why it didn't match the equation.

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The equation assumes ideal circumstances. A real experiment is rarely so simple. You should be able to come up with some ways that the experiment doesn't match the ideal model.
 
Khashishi said:
The equation assumes ideal circumstances. A real experiment is rarely so simple. You should be able to come up with some ways that the experiment doesn't match the ideal model.

Agreed, but what are the factors that makes it not ideal?
 
Sorry if this is a really obvious suggestion but...

Rulers have zero at one end, not at the fulcrum. So when you worked out the "load arm" and "effort distance" did you calculate the distance from the fulcrum or just write down the number on the ruler?
 
Actually, you can take moments about any point. But if you don't take the mid(balance ) point of the ruler, you have to include the weight of the ruler and the calculation is more long winded. For an easier result, you must do as CWatters suggests and relate everything to the mid point. You need to take your distance measurements carefully if you want your sums to 'balance' too.
 
A "30 cm ruler" in the U.S. is very likely 12 inches long -- 30.48 cm. If you were to use the 15 cm marker as the nominal midpoint then your measured moment arms would all be off by 0.24 cm. If you were to use the 15 cm marker as the fulcrum then you would have an additional 0.48 cm of ruler unaccounted-for at one end.
 

Thread '1:1 versus 2:1 Mechanical Advantage debate'

The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
View full post »

Thread 'Newton's first law?'

Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
View full post »
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'

Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'

Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
View full post »

Similar threads

Crankshafts, which class of lever
Replies
2
Views
3K
Torque and Moment of Inertia of a Lever Arm
Replies
2
Views
3K
I 3D Printed Piston | Lower mass = Power
Replies
41
Views
4K
B Lever balancing physics (video game design)
Replies
18
Views
2K
Solving a Lever System: Lever Arm and Load Lengths
Replies
4
Views
2K
How long would a lever have to be to compete with a hydroelectric dam?
Replies
5
Views
2K
Can a gyroscope lift a fulcrum (and itself), hinged to the floor?
Replies
8
Views
3K
Automotive Steering Force, Determining the Lever Arm
Replies
9
Views
1K
Unraveling the Mystery of "Floating Rule" in an Experiment
Replies
7
Views
2K
Calculating Effort Needed for Unevenly-Loaded Class 2 Lever
Replies
8
Views
4K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top