Classic problems about parity property

  • Thread starter Thread starter nulll
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Parity Property
nulll
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Dear Friends,

I'm would like know classic problems about parity property, in other hand, classic problems that has in your solutions, in any way, issues about parity. I want investigate issues about the use of parity in distributed algorithms.

Anybody can help me?

Thank's..

Nulll
 
Physics news on Phys.org
nulll said:
Dear Friends,

I'm would like know classic problems about parity property, in other hand, classic problems that has in your solutions, in any way, issues about parity. I want investigate issues about the use of parity in distributed algorithms.

Anybody can help me?

Thank's..

Nulll
I do not know what you mean by "distributed algorithms".
 
ramsey2879 said:
I do not know what you mean by "distributed algorithms".

Distributed algorithms in computation context, how to calculate the function f(x1, x2) when two different parts receive only one input (x1 or x2). I know that the parity can be used to reduce the communication complexity (the amount of bits exchanged between parts) required to calculate the inner product function. Then, I would like know mathmatical problems that use, in any way, the parity as a tool.

Thank's.
 

Thread '##(A/\mathfrak{a})_{\mathfrak{p}/\mathfrak{a}}## and its isomorphism?'

I asked online questions about Proposition 2.1.1: The answer I got is the following: I have some questions about the answer I got. When the person answering says: ##1.## Is the map ##\mathfrak{q}\mapsto \mathfrak{q} A _\mathfrak{p}## from ##A\setminus \mathfrak{p}\to A_\mathfrak{p}##? But I don't understand what the author meant for the rest of the sentence in mathematical notation: ##2.## In the next statement where the author says: How is ##A\to...
View full post »

Thread 'Trouble understanding an online solution to an exercise in Dummit & Foote'

##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
View full post »

Thread 'Questions about non existence of GCDs vs (coimages, cokernels)'

The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
View full post »

Similar threads

B Why does parity give raise to pseudovectors?
Replies
14
Views
5K
I Dirac equation in the hydrogen atom
Replies
1
Views
2K
Initial states ppbar can proceed to npi^0 with parity conserved
Replies
1
Views
1K
MHB Fourier Series involving Hyperbolic Functions
Replies
9
Views
4K
B Symmetry of parity: Mistake in the experiment?
Replies
2
Views
2K
Problem about identical particles
Replies
5
Views
2K
Possible decay states strong interaction, parity conservation
Replies
8
Views
2K
I Confused about perturbation theory
Replies
3
Views
1K
I Properties of Defective Matrices in Space?
Replies
8
Views
2K
I Physical reality of nontrivial loops in SO(3)
Replies
6
Views
2K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top