- #1
Tangent87
- 148
- 0
Hi, I'm doing this Classical Dynamics section II question which can be found here (http://www.maths.cam.ac.uk/undergrad/pastpapers/2008/Part_2/list_II.pdf ) on page 27.
I have done most of the question but am unsure about the last part. Specifically using Hamilton's equations to show there's circular motion of radius r with the angular frequency given. I am basically just unsure of what you actually have to show, I mean they've already told us that [tex]r^2=x_1^2+x_2^2[/tex] so what actually constitutes circular motion? I can show from Hamilton's equations that
[tex]\stackrel{..}{x_i}=(p_3-\frac{eF}{c})\frac{e}{m^{2}cr}\frac{dF}{dr}x_i[/tex]
for i=1,2 getting someway towards the expression for the angular frequency but don't really know where to go from here seeing as r depends on BOTH [tex]x_1[/tex] and [tex]x_2[/tex] so that differential equation isn't of SHM form!
I have done most of the question but am unsure about the last part. Specifically using Hamilton's equations to show there's circular motion of radius r with the angular frequency given. I am basically just unsure of what you actually have to show, I mean they've already told us that [tex]r^2=x_1^2+x_2^2[/tex] so what actually constitutes circular motion? I can show from Hamilton's equations that
[tex]\stackrel{..}{x_i}=(p_3-\frac{eF}{c})\frac{e}{m^{2}cr}\frac{dF}{dr}x_i[/tex]
for i=1,2 getting someway towards the expression for the angular frequency but don't really know where to go from here seeing as r depends on BOTH [tex]x_1[/tex] and [tex]x_2[/tex] so that differential equation isn't of SHM form!
Last edited by a moderator: