Classical mechanics and conservation of momentum

darkar
Messages
187
Reaction score
0
Heres the question:

A car of mass m = 1200 kg and length l = 4 m is positioned such that its rear end is at the end of a flat-top boat of massM = 8000 kg and length L = 18 m. Both the car and the boat are initially at rest and can be approximated as uniform in their mass distributions and the boat can slide through the water without significant resistance.

Assuming the car accelerates with a constant acceleration a = 4 m/s^2 relative to the boat.

Use momentum conservation to find a relation between the velocity of the car relative to the boat and the velocity of the boat relative to the water. Hence show that the distance traveled by the boat, until the car falls off, is independent of the acceleration of the car.

My trying:
Since there's no external force, the Momentum of the center of Mass frame stay the same at initial and final state. Then i got the velocity of the car as -(20/3) x V(boat at final).

Then do the same thing to get the relationship between boat and water. But i don't get how to show that the distance moved is independence of the acceleration. Any help?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
darkar said:
My trying:
Since there's no external force, the Momentum of the center of Mass frame stay the same at initial and final state. Then i got the velocity of the car as -(20/3) x V(boat at final).
Write an expression for the total momentum of boat + car with respect to the water. Note that they want "a relation between the velocity of the car relative to the boat and the velocity of the boat relative to the water."

Then do the same thing to get the relationship between boat and water. But i don't get how to show that the distance moved is independence of the acceleration.
No matter what speed the car travels with respect to the boat, when the car gets to the end of the boat, the boat will have moved the same distance (with respect to the water). Hint: The center of mass of boat+car does not move.
 
To solve this, I first used the units to work out that a= m* a/m, i.e. t=z/λ. This would allow you to determine the time duration within an interval section by section and then add this to the previous ones to obtain the age of the respective layer. However, this would require a constant thickness per year for each interval. However, since this is most likely not the case, my next consideration was that the age must be the integral of a 1/λ(z) function, which I cannot model.

Similar threads

Back
Top