Classical Mechanics - Moving Object in 3D space

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a physics homework problem involving a 1 kg mass moving in 3D space, where the z-coordinate is defined as z = e^{ax} and y is always zero. The main points of confusion arise from the absence of a specified force field, leading to questions about how to calculate potential and kinetic energy without explicit gravitational force. Participants emphasize the necessity of assuming gravity as the acting force to solve the problem, highlighting the importance of understanding the fundamental concepts of mechanics rather than merely applying formulas. The discussion also touches on the implications of movement in 3D space and the need for a force to account for acceleration. Overall, the thread underscores the challenge of solving mechanics problems without clear parameters.
TanGeriN
Messages
5
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Hello, i have the following task, which should actually not be too hard, but for for some reason i cannot figure out the answer.

Consider an Object with 1 kg mass in 3D space with coordinates \vec r = [x(t), y(t), z(t)]. Like Shown in the attachment, z:= e^{ax} and furthermore y = 0 (always).

a) Calculate the potential energy and the kinetic energy at x = 0 and velocity \vec v(t) = 0

b) Calculate the potential energy and the kinetic energy at x = \eta andz = e^{a\eta}. \eta is some real number.

c) Calculate the velocity \vec v(t) and the direction of the object at x = \eta

Homework Equations



I know the following equations for kinetic and potetial energy:

Potential energy: V(\vec r) = m*h*g, where hight h might be z ...
Kinetic energy: T(t) = \frac{1}{2} m v^2

The Attempt at a Solution



At first i wanted to use these equations above, but the problem is, that there is actually no force field given in this task ... also gravity is not mentioned explicitly. Is it even possible to solve this task without having a force? Maybe, I'm using the wrong equations. I also thought of V(\vec r) = \int \vec F(\vec r) for the potential.
It might be necessary (and reasonable) to assume gravity as the force field ...


I hope that somebody can help me.
 

Attachments

  • Unbenannt.PNG
    Unbenannt.PNG
    2.4 KB · Views: 487
Physics news on Phys.org
Strange. 3D space goes very far. Makes a difference if you are on Earth or way beyond Alpha Centauri.

your z is ##e^{-ax}## in the attachment, by the way. I don't understand what you mean with z:=
 
If it is moving along a curve, there must be some force acting on it to accelerate it. What do you know about constraint forces and changes in PE and KE?

The question testing if you understand the basics ideas of mechanics, not if you can plug and chug algebra formulas.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top