Clock-experimental proof of special relativity

  • #51
Dale
Mentor
Insights Author
2020 Award
30,697
7,293


You can falsify my statement that determinism is empirically proved by giving an alternative explanation for the clock-alteration of measurements.

Just because you can't falsify my thesis doesn't mean you can seriously neutralize it.
The clock alteration measurements are a completely irrelevant red herring. As you said, there is no experiment which could possibly be performed which would falsify your concept of determinism. That is what it means to be unfalsifiable.

So your definition is compatible with any and all theories, including ones where clocks don't alter. Experimental results cannot provide evidence against your definition, therefore they cannot provide evidence for it either. Which is the reason why your definition of determinism is non scientific and completely useless.
 
Last edited:

Related Threads on Clock-experimental proof of special relativity

  • Last Post
4
Replies
90
Views
12K
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • Last Post
7
Replies
161
Views
23K
Replies
29
Views
7K
  • Sticky
  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
56K
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
17
Views
6K
Replies
12
Views
4K
Replies
18
Views
5K
Top