Closest stable orbit of a body around earth

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the closest stable orbit of the Moon around Earth, allowing for some eccentricity in the orbit. Key parameters include the masses of the Moon and Earth, along with the gravitational constant. The user seeks guidance on whether calculating the velocity of the Moon or the acceleration due to gravity is the best approach for determining this orbit. They also note that low Earth orbits are influenced by atmospheric drag, which affects stability. The problem is framed as a fun math project rather than a real-world application.
AndrewC
Messages
6
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


This is a problem I picked for my calculus one class that I would like to solve, then model the solution using the sandbox video game universe sandbox. I would like to calculate the closest stable orbit of the moon, if possible allowing for some eccentricity in the orbit making it an ellipse. If this is the wrong forum to post this in I apologize.
mass of moon = 7.348x10^22kg
Mass of Earth = 5.97x0^24kg
Gravitational constant = 6.674x10^-11m^3kg^-1s^-2
Gravitational parameter of moon = G(m1+m2) = u = 4.03x10^14[/B]

Homework Equations


V=sqrt(u ((2/r)-(1/a)))
r = current distance from parent body
a = semi major axis of orbiting body
u = Gravitational parameter = GM if orbiting body's mass is small compared to parent body.
u = G (m1+m2) if orbiting body's mass is comparable to parent body.

The Attempt at a Solution


I'm not sure calculating velocitiy of tge moon or acceleration due to gravity is the best way to find the closest stable orbit? Looking for any input.[/B]
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
By stable orbit, it this considering low Earth orbits are affected by the outer fringes of the atmosphere, so they are slowed down and the orbit is not "stable"?
 
Sorry I needed to update all of the info. I'm specifically thinking of the moon. So this is not a very real world problem. It's so e thing I picked for fun for a math project.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top