Cmos imaging sensor response

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the response of CMOS imaging sensors and whether their measurements remain constant when total exposure is held constant, despite variations in irradiance and exposure time. It is clarified that while an ideal sensor would measure accumulated photons, real sensors deal with complexities such as dark current and charge accumulation. The conversion of photons to charge is linear, but the charge-to-digital number conversion may not be, particularly in CMOS sensors compared to CCDs. Most consumer CMOS sensors operate in a nearly linear region for charge-to-voltage conversion, with calibration methods employed to maintain this linearity. Ultimately, the charge-to-digital conversion process is crucial for understanding sensor response under varying conditions.
nbo10
Messages
416
Reaction score
5
Hi all,
I have a question about the response of a cmos imaging sensor. The total exposure is defined as the irradiance * pixel area * exposure time and it can be varied by changing either the irradiance or the exposure time. Would the sensor response remain constant if measurements are taken with variable irradiances and exposure times under the condition that the total exposure is constant?

My naive thinking would assume that the sensor would measure the same value at constant total exposure independent of the irradiance and exposure time values. Or are there other details, particular the circuit used convert charge to a digital number, that effect the sensor value? Thanks
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
nbo10 said:
My naive thinking would assume that the sensor would measure the same value at constant total exposure independent of the irradiance and exposure time values.
An ideal sensor measures the accumalated number of photons - it doesn't care about the rate they arrived.
In practice real sensors have a dark current, as signal that builds up with time even without light, and a leakage where very low level signals may be lost
 
NobodySpecial said:
An ideal sensor measures the accumalated number of photons - t

Well this is wrong. Photons are not accumulated. There is a photon to charge conversion and charge carrier is accumulated. Now, the conversion of photons to change is linear but the conversion of charge to digital number might not be linear. The charge-to-digital number conversion is the heart of my question.
 
nbo10 said:
Well this is wrong. Photons are not accumulated.
Didn't say they were - I said it measured the number of photons accumulated - as opposed to measuring their rate as a photocell or photocathode might.

conversion of charge to digital number might not be linear.
The charge to voltage on the pixel unit cell is inherently not linear for a CMOS sensor - as opposed to a CCD where it almost is. But most real devices, especially consumer units, are run in a region where they are pretty linear.

The charge-to-digital number conversion is the heart of my question.
The per pixel charge->voltage conversion and the output amp are generally pretty much linear - it's too hard to do calibration otherwise.
You could make the output amp->ADC non-linear to match the response of photographic film or of an older tube TV camera but most don't.
The normal way is just ot have a programmable gain stage and switch in a different linear multiplication before the ADC.
 
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Hello dear reader, a brief introduction: Some 4 years ago someone started developing health related issues, apparently due to exposure to RF & ELF related frequencies and/or fields (Magnetic). This is currently becoming known as EHS. (Electromagnetic hypersensitivity is a claimed sensitivity to electromagnetic fields, to which adverse symptoms are attributed.) She experiences a deep burning sensation throughout her entire body, leaving her in pain and exhausted after a pulse has occurred...
Back
Top