Coarse Graining and the Second Law of Thermodynamics

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the confusion regarding coarse graining in the context of the second law of thermodynamics and statistical physics. The participant, Fraser, understands that a point in phase space represents a microstate and follows the derivation of Liouville's equation, which indicates that the density of points remains constant over time. However, Fraser questions how averaging the density of phase space can lead to an increase in entropy, as it seems to involve losing information about the ensemble. The argument suggests that while averaging may not directly increase entropy, it implies a potential increase if the particles were more spread out. The conversation highlights the complexities of reconciling coarse graining with the principles of the second law of thermodynamics.
Fraser
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hi all, first post so be nice :)

I'm currently taking a statistical physics course and I am very confused about an aspect relating to the second law.

Currently we are considering a member of an ensemble to be represented by a moving point in phase space (a 6N dimensional space spanned by Pi and qi from Hamiltonian). My notes for this show that a point in this space represents a microstate of the assembly. I can just about accept this.

I have been presented with a full derivation for Liovilles equation (which I follow) and this has shown that the density of representative points are constant with time. From the classical definition of Gibbs Entropy this leads to the entropy change with time equal to 0. I follow the maths for this ok, which is fine.

What I don't understand is the idea of coarse graining that follows this. My notes say that by averaging the density of phase space over a fixed local scale we can increase S. But why is this? Surely all we have done is 'drop' some information about the ensemble and therefore force S to increase? But how is this right? How can we just forget about some particles and therefore say the entropy has increased? Surely this means that we CAN'T consider particles as an incompressible fluid since the second law isn't obeyed when we do this?

Thanks in advance,

Fraser
 
Science news on Phys.org
I think it is saying that IF the particles were all spread out, the entropy would increase. If you just average the density then the actual entropy isn't increasing, but it would if that actually happened. Thats what it looks like to me at least.
 
I was watching a Khan Academy video on entropy called: Reconciling thermodynamic and state definitions of entropy. So in the video it says: Let's say I have a container. And in that container, I have gas particles and they're bouncing around like gas particles tend to do, creating some pressure on the container of a certain volume. And let's say I have n particles. Now, each of these particles could be in x different states. Now, if each of them can be in x different states, how many total...
Thread 'Why work is PdV and not (P+dP)dV in an isothermal process?'
Let's say we have a cylinder of volume V1 with a frictionless movable piston and some gas trapped inside with pressure P1 and temperature T1. On top of the piston lay some small pebbles that add weight and essentially create the pressure P1. Also the system is inside a reservoir of water that keeps its temperature constant at T1. The system is in equilibrium at V1, P1, T1. Now let's say i put another very small pebble on top of the piston (0,00001kg) and after some seconds the system...

Similar threads

Replies
29
Views
3K
Replies
100
Views
8K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
3K
Back
Top