Coefficient determination for the underdamped oscillator

buffordboy23
Messages
545
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement



The general solution of the underdamped oscillator is given by

x(t) = exp(-Bt)*[(A1)cos{(w1)t} + (A2)sin{(w1)t}]

Solve for x0 = x(t=0) and v0 = v(t=0) in terms of A1 and A2. Then solve for A1 and A2 in terms of x0, v0 , and w1.

Homework Equations



w1 = sqrt{ (w0)^2 - B^2 }

The Attempt at a Solution



At t = 0, x(0) = x0 = A1.

Now taking the derivative w.r.t time gives,

v(t) = -Bexp(-Bt)*[(A1)cos{(w1)t} + (A2)sin{(w1)t}] + exp(-Bt)*[(A2)(w1)cos{(w1)t} - (A1)(w1)cos{(w1)t}]

So, v(0) = v0 = -B(A1) + A2(w1).

Am I being retarded somewhere, or is it impossible to solve for A1 and A2 in terms of x0, v0, and w1 only? The problem never indicates anything about using approximations, such as B is close to zero, so v0 can be approximated as v0 = A2(w1). Does this seem like the only route to go with? Thanks.

By the way, Latex isn't working, so I had to use this convoluted notation.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
B does not depend on initial conditions. It's a parameter of the system(as w is).
B is a damping factor, depends on viscosity of the medium, shape of the oscillator... will be the same no matter what initial conditions.
 
To solve this, I first used the units to work out that a= m* a/m, i.e. t=z/λ. This would allow you to determine the time duration within an interval section by section and then add this to the previous ones to obtain the age of the respective layer. However, this would require a constant thickness per year for each interval. However, since this is most likely not the case, my next consideration was that the age must be the integral of a 1/λ(z) function, which I cannot model.
Back
Top