Coefficient of kinetic friction and acceleration

AI Thread Summary
A 3.00 kg block slides down a 30-degree ramp, covering 2.00 m in 1.20 seconds, resulting in an acceleration of 1.78 m/s². To find the coefficient of kinetic friction, the normal force is calculated as 25.5 N using mgcos30. The frictional force needs to be determined, and it is essential to set up a free body diagram to visualize the forces acting on the block. The relationship between the frictional force and the normal force is given by Fk = uFn, where u is the coefficient of kinetic friction. The difference between the calculated acceleration and the expected acceleration without friction can help find the frictional force and ultimately the coefficient of friction.
Leid_X09
Messages
14
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A 3.00 kg block starts from rest and moves down a ramp on an incline of 30 degrees. If it makes it 2.00 m down the incline in 1.20 s, then:

a) what is the acceleration of the block?

This answer I got using dX=Vot + 1/2at^2. The answer is 1.78 m/s^2.

b) the coefficient of kinetic friction between the block and the ramp.

Here is where I run into problems. n can be found using mgcos30 (29.4cos30) which gives you n = 25.5. But I'm confused on how to determine the frictional force. I know it can't be -fk = ma, since the object is in moving so fk should be less than ma. How can I set this equation up? What variable am I not looking at? I know that uk = Fk/n, but how do I get Fk?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Your first step is going to be setting up a free body diagram. After that, keep in mind that Fk= uFn, where u= u(k)

Use Ef(x)=ma(x). you already determined the x-accel in the first part.

So from what you said, you thought it was -Fk=ma(x). So -uFn=ma(x), = -u=Ma(x)/Fn, wouldn't that value be smaller than ma?

The only problem now seems to be your negative value of u... see where you went wrong?
 
Last edited:
I think you need to recalculate your acceleration. That doesn't look right.

Once you have your acceleration, what should your acceleration have been if it were frictionless? You know the component of gravity down the incline. And you have an answer for the acceleration with friction, so the difference in acceleration must be due to the frictional force acting on the mass.

Once you have that force, you have the normal component of gravity to the incline accounting for that force and the ratio is called the coefficient of friction.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top