Coefficient of Kinetic Friction

AI Thread Summary
The problem involves calculating the coefficient of kinetic friction for a 1,440-N crate being pushed with a force of 270 N at a 20° angle. The calculated coefficient of kinetic friction is 0.165, derived from the normal force and frictional force equations. The normal force is determined to be 1532 N, which includes the weight of the crate and the vertical component of the applied force. The frictional force is represented by 254 N, the horizontal component of the applied force. Clarification is sought on why these specific values are used for the frictional force and normal force in the calculations.
MG5
Messages
60
Reaction score
0
Heres the problem,

A 1,440-N crate is being pushed across a level floor at a constant speed by a force of 270 N at an angle of 20.0° below the horizontal

(a) What is the coefficient of kinetic friction between the crate and the floor?

I know how to do this. The answer is .165

Heres how I solved it..

270sin20 = 92 N
270cos20 = 254 N

1440N + 92N = 1532N

Ff=uk(n)

254N=uk(1532)

uk= .165

The only thing I don't quite get is why do I use 254N, the product of 270cos20, as the Ff and why is 1532N the normal force?

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The only thing I don't quite get is why do I use 254N, the product of 270cos20, as the Ff and why is 1532N the normal force?
......
You have chose the values. Surely you have reasons for choosing them.
I think the questions should be are your reasonings correct?
 
azizlwl said:
The only thing I don't quite get is why do I use 254N, the product of 270cos20, as the Ff and why is 1532N the normal force?
......
You have chose the values. Surely you have reasons for choosing them.
I think the questions should be are your reasonings correct?

I knew someone was going to say this. The reason I don't know why I'm using those numbers that I solved for is because I saw the solution to the problem worked out. I understand everything but why those numbers are used for Ff and n. Other than that everything else seems easy and makes sense.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top