Coefficient of Static Friction on a Turntable

AI Thread Summary
The lab aims to determine the coefficient of static friction between a metal washer and both metal and rubber surfaces by measuring the RPM at which washers fly off a turntable at varying distances from the center. Data indicates that the coefficient of static friction is lowest at medium distances for both surfaces, with the highest coefficient for the rubber surface occurring at the shortest radius and for the metal surface at the largest radius. The participant seeks clarification on these unexpected results, particularly why the coefficients behave differently across distances. They express uncertainty about their methodology and request assistance in understanding the findings. The discussion highlights the complexities of friction coefficients in dynamic systems.
jhawks8
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
I'm doing a lab for my technical dynamics class and that lab is to determine the coefficient of static friction between a metal washer and both metal and rubber surfaces.

I did the experiment using 3 washers set at different distances from the center of the turntable as instructed, and recorded the RPM at which the washers of each distances flew off the turntable. My data is below:

Rubber Surface
r(m) |RPM |w(rad) |µ | AVG µ
0.03 |123 |12.88 |0.507|
0.03 |154 |16.13 | 0.796| 0.676
0.03 |147 |15.39 |0.724|

0.06 |100 |10.47 |0.671
0.06 |97 |10.16 |0.631 |0.607
0.06 |88 |9.22 |0.52

0.1 |71 |7.44 |0.564
0.1 |80 |8.38 |0.716 |0.647
0.1 |77 |8.06 |0.662

Metal Surface

r(m)|RPM |w(rad) |u...|AVG µ
0.06 |77 |8.06 |0.397
0.06 |67 |7.02 |0.301 |0.376
0.06 |80 |8.38 |0.43

0.08 |62 |6.49 |0.344
0.08 |62 |6.49 |0.344 |0.363
0.08 |67 |7.02 |0.402

0.1 |61 |6.39 |0.416
0.1 |61 |6.39 |0.416 |0.403
0.1 |58 |6.07 |0.376

What is not making sense to me is why the coefficient of static friction is the lowest when in the medium distances. Also, the largest coefficient for the metal surface is the largest radius, and the largest coefficient for the rubber surface is the shortest radius.

I need help understanding this, or if I'm doing something wrong and I don't know it. Any help is really appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Sorry for the sloppy tables.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top