Coincidence summing in gamma ray spectrometry

boyanne
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
In gamma-ray spectrometry with germanium detector, the summing effects have to be taken into account at low source detector distance. The peaks due to coincidence summing of X+X, X+gamma, gamma+gamma rays can complicate the spectrum obtained by this type of detector and significantly change the counting rates of single peaks.

There is theoretical model developed for coincidence summing of X- and gamma-rays for radionuclides with complex decay schemes. This model enables to write equations for single peaks, the coincidence sum peaks and the total count rate. The efficiencies of detection and the activity are the unknowns in the count rate equation system. They can be determined by simultaneously finding the roots of the equation system. The theory was initially applied to the
Ce-139 decay (Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research A 582 (2007) 592–602) and I try to do the same thing for Co-60!

If anybody interesting for subject and for discussion, I can send him some reference and some of my work (this is my master thesis). Of course, I have some doubts about my work and some discussion will be helpful!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...

Similar threads

Back
Top