SwitzerlandBandersnatch said:
Grammatical error? Did you mean: "...and finds something for him to do". ?dextercioby said:
Good point. At the very least its grammatically ambiguous. The husband should point that out to her.strangerep said:
That is a female joke Fresh.fresh_42 said:
Or a Star Trek joke. Admittedly referring Marina Sirtis, but anyway.pinball1970 said:
Give me a minute..fresh_42 said:
0:18pinball1970 said:
I'm a Kirk 60s guy but I take your word for it.fresh_42 said:
That’s cruciferous …jtbell said:
B Russell's . Is that Bertrand Russell?jtbell said:
Nope. It was a political joke but nobody recognized.WWGD said:
Don't be so hard on yourself, you're not a political joke!fresh_42 said:
Orodruin said:
fresh_42 said:
One of my professors told a much longer version of that one in class …Ibix said:
I heard a longer version from my dad a long time ago, too. According to Wikipedia the first log table was compiled by Briggs in 1617, and I suspect this joke dates to about fifteen minutes after that...Orodruin said:
My professor’s version just included logs. A long winded story with Noah repeatedly returning to see how the animals were doing - no baby snakes. He asks the snakes if he can help them and they tell him he can cut down a couple of trees at the edge of the forest. Noah doesn’t want to pry into the personal affairs of snakes so he just does what they say and returns a week later. Sure enough, lots of baby snakes. Now Noah’s curiosity gets the better of him so he asks why the snakes needed him to cut down the trees, receiving the answer:Ibix said:
That sounds like my dad's version, and it can be spun out indefinitely by describing Noah chatting with the animals. But in this version the snakes complain about a lack of privacy for... you know, and nowhere to raise the little ones. So Noah chops down a tree and builds them a small cabin and some furniture, and when he comes back the next time he's knee-deep in baby snakes because adders can multiply if they have log tables.Orodruin said:
