Collisions in rotational dynamics

AI Thread Summary
When a particle collides with a stationary rod, the rod rotates about the center of mass of the system due to the conservation of angular momentum. The angular momentum can be expressed as the sum of the angular momentum about the center of mass and the angular momentum relative to the center of mass. If the particle does not stick to the rod, the rod still rotates about the center of mass because the collision imparts angular momentum. In cases where they stick together, the system's center of mass does not rotate about its own center unless acted upon by an external force, aligning with the principles of F=ma. Understanding these dynamics clarifies the behavior of rotating systems in collisions.
physiks
Messages
101
Reaction score
0
If I have say a stationary rod, and a particle collides with the rod whilst moving at speed v at the top end, why does the rod then proceed to rotate about the centre of mass of the system (whether that be in an elastic or completely inelastic collision where they both stick together).

I believe it may have something to do with the fact the angular momentum can be written as
L=LCM+L'
with the first term that of a particle with the total mass of the system moving at the CM, and the second the angular momentum of the system relative to the CM (i.e in the CM frame). Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Is that true? If the particle doesn't stick to the rod, why would the rod rotate about the center of mass of the system? Wouldn't it rotate about its own center of mass as it is not interacting with the particle anymore?

In the case where the two stick together, if they don't rotate about their center of mass, that means the center of mass is rotating about another point, so it is accelerating. Is that consistent with F=ma?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top