Colloidal Particles and their size

  • Thread starter Thread starter Prashasti
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Particles
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around determining how many subdivisions of a 1-meter cube are required to reduce its size to that of colloidal particles, specifically 100 nanometers (nm). The original cube is halved in size with each subdivision. The mathematical approach involves setting the new length 'a' equal to (1/2)^n multiplied by the original length 'l'. By substituting the target size (10^-7 m) into the equation, the calculation leads to n = 23.253 subdivisions. This result is confirmed through logarithmic manipulation and an understanding of powers of 2, reinforcing the accuracy of the solution. The conversation highlights the mathematical reasoning behind the problem and the significance of orders of magnitude in calculations.
Prashasti
Messages
63
Reaction score
2
Suppose we have a cube, of length 1 metre. It is cut in all the three directions so that 8 cubes, each having 0.5 m as its length. Then, these cubes are again subdivided in the same manner to get cubes with length 0.25m and so on.

HOW MANY OF THESE SUCCESSIVE SUBDIVISIONS ARE REQUIRED BEFORE THE SIZE OF THE CUBES IS REDUCED TO THE SIZE OF COLLOIDAL PARTICLES, which is 100 nm??
 
Chemistry news on Phys.org
Come on, we all know that all indians are brilliant mathematicians, so show us at least your intent of solution.
 
Ok, then, what I did was,

Let original length be 'l',
Now one subdivision reduces the length to half of its original value, and 2, to one fourth. So, 'n' subdivisions will lead to reduction of the length to ( 1/2)^n.
Let new length be 'a'.
So, a = (1/2)^n *l.
in the given case,
a = 10^-7 *l
which means,
10^-7 = (1/2)^n
taking log,
n log 2 = 7 log 10
Which gives n = 23.253.
So, am I right??
 
This seems to be correct. It is helpful to have some orders of magnitude in mind. The powers of 2 we all know from informatics: ##2^{10}=1024\approx 10^3## and ##2^3=8\approx 10## so ##10^7=10^3*10^3*10\approx 10^{23}##.
 
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Got it. Thanks.
 
Last edited:
I want to test a humidity sensor with one or more saturated salt solutions. The table salt that I have on hand contains one of two anticaking agents, calcium silicate or sodium aluminosilicate. Will the presence of either of these additives (or iodine for that matter) significantly affect the equilibrium humidity? I searched and all the how-to-do-it guides did not address this question. One research paper I found reported that at 1.5% w/w calcium silicate increased the deliquescent point by...
Back
Top