Combined rotational and translational motion

e2m2a
Messages
354
Reaction score
13

Homework Statement



I need to determine the total kinetic energy of a long thin rod relative to a laboratory frame which rotates around an axis at an angular velocity w and the axis moves at a constant translational velocity. The mass of the rod is M and the length of the rod is L. The translational velocity of the axis is Vaxis.

Homework Equations


Moment of Inertia, I, of rod is: 1/3 M (L sq) (This is because the rod rotates at one end).


The Attempt at a Solution


I believe the total kinetic energy should be: Total KE = 1/2 M (Vaxis sq) + 1/2 I (w sq).
Is this correct?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
e2m2a said:
[Moment of Inertia, I, of rod is: 1/3 M (L sq) (This is because the rod rotates at one end).


The Attempt at a Solution


I believe the total kinetic energy should be: Total KE = 1/2 M (Vaxis sq) + 1/2 I (w sq).
Is this correct?
Hello e2m2a
The moment of inertia is correct and addition of energies too. Is there some relation of the tangential and the rotational velocities. Remind that the endpoint velocitie for a whip is one mach. The maximum is there when the endpoint of the rods velocity L*w adds up to Vaxis.
greetings Janm
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top