Combining Infinite Series: Can I Make These Two Series Start at the Same Point?

Jamin2112
Messages
973
Reaction score
12

Homework Statement



Rewrite the given expression as a sum whose generic term involves xn

[m=2 to ∞] ∑m(m-1)amxm-2 + [k=1 to ∞] x∑kakxk-1

Homework Equations



None in this problem

The Attempt at a Solution



To make the first part involve only xn, I can use the substitution n=m-2.

[n=0 to ∞] ∑(n+2)(n+1)an+2xn.

But I can't make the second part in terms of xn and [n=0 to ∞], as far as I know.

[k=1 to ∞] x∑kakxk-1 = [k=1 to ∞] ∑kakxk = [n=1 to ∞] ∑nanxn

If I try to take change the start of the sum to n=0, that will effect the xn. See what I'm saying? I want to combine this into one big sum from n=0 to ∞.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Jamin2112 said:
[k=1 to ∞] x∑kakxk-1 = [k=1 to ∞] ∑kakxk = [n=1 to ∞] ∑nanxn

If I try to take change the start of the sum to n=0, that will effect the xn. See what I'm saying?
So don't do that then. At this stage you have two series, both of which are in terms of xn. The only problem is one starts at n=0 while the other starts at n=1. Can you make them start at the same point?
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top