Combining Resistors and Capacitors

AI Thread Summary
In a series circuit with two capacitors and two resistors, the overall capacitance and resistance remain unchanged regardless of their order. When arranged in parallel, swapping the positions of resistors or capacitors does not affect the total capacitance or resistance either. For a series configuration like RCRCRCRC, it is possible to combine all resistors and capacitors into a single equivalent resistor and capacitor circuit. This combined circuit can be rearranged without changing the overall behavior, meaning the order of R and C does not impact the final circuit characteristics. Understanding these principles is crucial for analyzing complex circuits effectively.
megaspazz
Messages
13
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



This is like related to a homework problem, but I'm just curious: If we have two capacitors and two resistors in series, the overall capacitance and resistance does not change regardless of the order, right? Likewise, if they were in parallel (like a resistor + capacitor in series in both branches of the parallel circuit), if you switched the two resistors or the two capacitors, will it cause the overall capacitance and resistance to change?

If you guys don't understand the question, I can draw and upload.

EDIT: I guess another thing I was wondering was: if I had a series circuit that was RCRCRCRC..., could I combine all of the R's in series and C's in series to make a single >---Rnet---Cnet---> circuit? If so, that would also mean that it's the same as the >---Cnet---Rnet---> circuit, right?

Homework Equations



R = R1 + R2 + R3 + ... (series R)
1/R = 1/R1 + 1/R2 + ... (parallel R)
C = C1 + C2 + C3 + ... (parallel C)
1/C = 1/C1 + 1/C2 + 1/C3 + ... (series C)
-- but I'm not too interested in quantitative!

The Attempt at a Solution



I know if the series circuit was in RRCC, swapping the two resistors is OK since they're already in series with each other. However, if it were in RCRC, would that be the same as the RRCC or CRRC, etc.?

Thanks in advance!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
megaspazz said:

Homework Statement



This is like related to a homework problem, but I'm just curious: If we have two capacitors and two resistors in series, the overall capacitance and resistance does not change regardless of the order, right? Likewise, if they were in parallel (like a resistor + capacitor in series in both branches of the parallel circuit), if you switched the two resistors or the two capacitors, will it cause the overall capacitance and resistance to change?

If you guys don't understand the question, I can draw and upload.

EDIT: I guess another thing I was wondering was: if I had a series circuit that was RCRCRCRC..., could I combine all of the R's in series and C's in series to make a single >---Rnet---Cnet---> circuit? If so, that would also mean that it's the same as the >---Cnet---Rnet---> circuit, right?

Homework Equations



R = R1 + R2 + R3 + ... (series R)
1/R = 1/R1 + 1/R2 + ... (parallel R)
C = C1 + C2 + C3 + ... (parallel C)
1/C = 1/C1 + 1/C2 + 1/C3 + ... (series C)
-- but I'm not too interested in quantitative!

The Attempt at a Solution



I know if the series circuit was in RRCC, swapping the two resistors is OK since they're already in series with each other. However, if it were in RCRC, would that be the same as the RRCC or CRRC, etc.?

Thanks in advance!
Do you know Kirchhoff's Laws?
 
Doesn't that just say the current at each junction is constant, and the voltage in each loop is zero? I am not too sure where you are going with this, though...
 
Bump?
 
Suppose you have a circuit branch consisting of some combination of R, L, C, components in series. Now suppose that some current I is being injected through that branch:

attachment.php?attachmentid=57725&stc=1&d=1365612097.gif


Can you write an expression for the sum of potential drops across the branch? That is, given current I, what's the voltage V across the branch with respect to time? (Assume no initial currents or charges at time t=0).

Now, if you were to use the same components but reorder them and then you were to find the same sum again, would there be any algebraic difference between the first expression and this new one?
 

Attachments

  • Fig1.gif
    Fig1.gif
    1.6 KB · Views: 1,064
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top