Communicating with Mavs via Cellphone: Requirements & Configurations

  • Thread starter Thread starter sid_galt
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Communication
AI Thread Summary
Using a cellphone for communication with a Micro Aerial Vehicle (MAV) raises concerns about bandwidth and video transmission quality. Current mobile networks, particularly 3G, may not provide sufficient bandwidth for smooth video streaming, with expectations of at least 7-8 frames per second. The discussion highlights the limitations of normal phones in handling high data rates required for live video feeds. Alternatives like small cameras that transmit directly to televisions are suggested for better performance. Additionally, questions arise about the feasibility of using a 16 MHz processor for video transmission and the potential of Enhanced Data GSM Environment for video compression.
sid_galt
Messages
502
Reaction score
1
Do you think a using a cellphone(just the necessary parts, not the whole body) for communication with a Micro Aerial Vehicle can work?
Will it be able to transmit a live video smoothly and handle the large amount of data transmission/sec?

If the video is constantly being downloaded on a computer, roughly what computer configuration is required to view it at a high frame rate?
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Please, does anyone have any idea?
 
I would suggest that the bandwidth is not nearly wide enough using normal phones.

Using 3G, you might just be able to do it (depending on what control requirements you have), but the video won't be anywhere near 'smooth'.
 
If you want to put a camera on a remotely controlled aircraft or vehicle, there are very small cameras that transmit a signal directly to a television.

http://www.hicam.com.au/art_faq.htm
 
Last edited by a moderator:
brewnog said:
I would suggest that the bandwidth is not nearly wide enough using normal phones.

Using 3G, you might just be able to do it (depending on what control requirements you have), but the video won't be anywhere near 'smooth'.

I live in India where 3G won't be available until next year so that is not an option for me.

By smooth, I mean atleast 7-8 frames/sec.

Are you referring to the bandwidth of internet available on cell phone? What is the bandwidth for normal phones?
How much bandwidth does an ordinary audio call of the cell have? Is it possible to use that method to transmit the video?

Is it possible using a 16 MHz processor on board to send a radio signal via cellphone modulating it 800*600 times/sec? This signal will then be interpreted by the computer and displayed as a video? Would that get the frame rates mentioned above?

Will black and white transmission at a smooth rate be possible?


Also what software would you recommend for modelling and calculating the airflow over the wings?

Would Enhanced Data GSM Environment work?
 
Last edited:
Would compression of the video using something with performance comparable to MPEG and then transmission via cell work?
 
Hi all, I have a question. So from the derivation of the Isentropic process relationship PV^gamma = constant, there is a step dW = PdV, which can only be said for quasi-equilibrium (or reversible) processes. As such I believe PV^gamma = constant (and the family of equations) should not be applicable to just adiabatic processes? Ie, it should be applicable only for adiabatic + reversible = isentropic processes? However, I've seen couple of online notes/books, and...
Thread 'How can I find the cleanout for my building drain?'
I am a long distance truck driver, but I recently completed a plumbing program with Stratford Career Institute. In the chapter of my textbook Repairing DWV Systems, the author says that if there is a clog in the building drain, one can clear out the clog by using a snake augur or maybe some other type of tool into the cleanout for the building drain. The author said that the cleanout for the building drain is usually near the stack. I live in a duplex townhouse. Just out of curiosity, I...
I have an engine that uses a dry sump oiling system. The oil collection pan has three AN fittings to use for scavenging. Two of the fittings are approximately on the same level, the third is about 1/2 to 3/4 inch higher than the other two. The system ran for years with no problem using a three stage pump (one pressure and two scavenge stages). The two scavenge stages were connected at times to any two of the three AN fittings on the tank. Recently I tried an upgrade to a four stage pump...
Back
Top