Commutation relation of angular momentum

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around calculating the commutation relations involving the angular momentum operator defined as L = R x P, where R represents position and P represents momentum. Participants are exploring the mathematical properties of these operators in the context of quantum mechanics.

Discussion Character

  • Mathematical reasoning, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are attempting to express the commutation relations using various mathematical notations and identities, including the Levi-Civita tensor and Einstein summation convention. Questions arise regarding the nature of the commutators and their implications for the scalar product of momentum and position.

Discussion Status

There is an ongoing exploration of the commutation relations, with some participants providing insights into the mathematical derivations. A few have suggested that the commutator of angular momentum with the scalar product of momentum and position is zero, but this is still being examined without a definitive conclusion.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working under the assumption that the basic commutation relation [R, P] = iħ holds, and they are considering the implications of this relation in their calculations. The discussion reflects a mix of interpretations and mathematical approaches to the problem.

p.p
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
Just wondering if any1 would by any chance know how to calculate the commutation relations when L = R x P is the angular momentum operator of a system?
[Li, P.R]=?

P
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Is it the dot product?
You can write it down as:
[Li,PiRi] (using Einstein summation notation).
and Li=Rj Pk ejki, where ejik is levi-civita tensor.
and using the basic relation for [R,P]=1 (units of hbar).
 
[tex][L_i,p_ir_i]=p_i[L_i,r_i]+[L_i,p_i]r_i[/tex]

Inserting:
[tex]L_i=\epsilon_{ijk}r_j p_k[/tex]
Gives:

[tex][L_i,p_ir_i]=\epsilon_{ijk}p_i[r_j p_k,r_i]+\epsilon_{ijk}[r_j p_k,p_i]r_i[/tex]
[tex]=\epsilon_{ijk}p_i r_j[p_k,r_i]+\epsilon_{ijk}[r_j,p_i]r_i p_k[/tex]
[tex]=-i\hbar\epsilon_{ijk}p_i r_j\delta_{ik}+i\hbar\epsilon_{ijk}\delta_{ij} r_i p_k[/tex]
[tex]=0[/tex]
 
Last edited:
The fact that the commutator of the angular momentum and the scalar product of p and r is zero follows naturally. The definition of a vector operator applies for both p and r individually, thus their scalar product should be a scalar operator, therefore the desired commutator is zero.
 

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K