Commutator, operators momentum and position

fluidistic
Gold Member
Messages
3,928
Reaction score
272

Homework Statement


I must calculate [X,P].

Homework Equations


Not sure. What I've researched through the Internet suggests that [\hat A, \hat B]=\hat A \hat B - \hat B \hat A and that [\hat A, \hat B]=-[\hat B, \hat A].
Furthermore if the operators commute, then [\hat A, \hat B]=0 obviously from the anterior property.

The Attempt at a Solution



So I've checked out in wikipedia the definition of position and momentum operators and they seems to involve the wave function \Psi?

If I consider \hat X =x and \hat P =-i\hbar \frac{\partial}{\partial x}, I get that \hat X\hat P =-i \hbar but for \hat P \hat X I have a doubt.
I get that it's worth x \left ( - \frac{i \hbar \partial}{\partial x} \right ). I'm guessing it's worth -i\hbar? So that if follows that [\hat X,\hat P]=0 and hence the position and linear momentum commute. I'm not sure I'm right on this, nor do I have any idea about some of the implications the commutativity implies.
Any insight is greatly appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
To avoid confusion, compute this commutator acting on an arbitrary wavefunction:

[\hat{X},\hat{P}]\Psi.

As a differential operator, \hat{P} acts on everything to the right, so the term

\hat{P}\hat{X} \Psi = \hat{P}(\hat{X} \Psi),

so you need to use the product rule.
 
fzero said:
To avoid confusion, compute this commutator acting on an arbitrary wavefunction:

[\hat{X},\hat{P}]\Psi.

As a differential operator, \hat{P} acts on everything to the right, so the term

\hat{P}\hat{X} \Psi = \hat{P}(\hat{X} \Psi),

so you need to use the product rule.

Thank you so much. I'm so glad I've asked on this forum, I would have done meaningless work without you.
I reach, after some basic alegebra: [\hat X, \hat P] \Psi =i \hbar \Psi. So the 2 operators do not commute.
Am I right?
 
fluidistic said:
Thank you so much. I'm so glad I've asked on this forum, I would have done meaningless work without you.
I reach, after some basic alegebra: [\hat X, \hat P] \Psi =i \hbar \Psi. So the 2 operators do not commute.
Am I right?

Correct. Also, since the function \Psi is arbitrary, you can turn this into an operator statement:

[\hat X, \hat P] =i \hbar \hat{I},

where \hat{I} is the identity operator.
 
fzero said:
Correct. Also, since the function \Psi is arbitrary, you can turn this into an operator statement:

[\hat X, \hat P] =i \hbar \hat{I},

where \hat{I} is the identity operator.

Nice. Problem solved.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top