Commutator question. [A,B] =.lambda proof

  • Thread starter Thread starter Jreyes613
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Commutator Proof
Jreyes613
Messages
9
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Hello!
I'm having troubles with this proof.
given two operators A &B , such that [A,B] = λ where λ is complex,and μ is also complex, show that

exp{μ(A+B)} = exp{μA}exp{μB}exp{(-μ^2λ)/2}


Homework Equations



[A,B] = λ.
[A,B] = AB-BA = λ

The Attempt at a Solution


I have tried expanding the right side of the equation into three different exponentials by subbing in λ=AB-BA.
I get exp{μ(2A+2B-μAB+μBA}
but i seem to have a factor of two extra...
I'm not even sure if i am on the right track, so if anyone could give me a starting point it would be greatly appreciated!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It seems like maybe you tried adding the exponents on the right hand side. That's not allowed. If e^Ae^B generally is not equal to e^{A+B}. That would contradict what you are trying to show. Anyway, I'm not sure the best way to solve this problem, but what you are trying to show is.


\sum_{n=0}^\infty \frac{\mu^nA^n}{n!} \sum_{m=0}^\infty \frac{\mu^mB^m}{m!} \sum_{a=0}^\infty \frac{\left(-1\right)^a\mu^{2a}\lambda^a}{2^a a!}
=\sum_{b=0}^\infty \frac{\mu^b (A+B)^b}{b!}

You could try seeing if you can figure out where at the terms come from in the first expression.
(A+B)^0= 1
(A+B)^1= A + B
(A+B)^2= A^2 + 2AB - [A,B]+ B^2 = A^2 + 2AB + B^2 - \lambda
(A+B)^3= (A+B)\left( A^2 + 2AB + B^2 - \lambda\right)

However I'm really not sure exactly how to get this result.
 
That's the Baker-Campbell-Hausdorff formula. Search with Google and you will probably find help in the proof.
 
Thank you guys.
Yes , my TA said that you can use the Baker -Campbell-Hausdorff formula.

I will be able to solve it now, thanks!
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top