Commutators of Lorentz generators

nrqed
Science Advisor
Messages
3,762
Reaction score
297
Equation 2.14 of Srednicki is:

U(\Lambda)^{-1} M^{\mu \nu} U(\Lambda) = \Lambda^{\mu}_{\,\,\rho} \Lambda^{\nu}_{\, \, \sigma} M^{\rho \sigma}

He says that writing \Lambda = 1 + \delta \omega, one obtains the usual commutation relation of the M_{\mu \nu}:

[ M^{\mu \nu},M^{\rho \sigma} ] = i ( g^{\mu \rho} M^{\nu \sigma} - (\mu \leftrightarrow \nu}) - (\rho \leftrightarrow \sigma)

I get, starting from the first equation

[ M^{\mu \nu},M^{\rho \sigma} ] \delta \omega_{\rho \sigma} = i (\eta^\mu_\rho \delta \omega^\nu_\sigma M^{\rho \sigma} + \eta^\nu_\sigma \delta \omega^\mu_\rho M^{\rho \sigma} )

I don't see how to extract the commutator because the omega on the right side contain one of the indices that is not summed over. Its' not clear to me how to proceed. Any suggestion?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think it should work if you stick in a kronecker delta.
 
Check the right hand side of the equation, you can write


<br /> <br /> \delta\omega^\nu_\sigma = \delta\omega_{\rho\sigma} \eta^{\rho \nu} <br /> <br />

Edit:

Also M is anti-symmetric, which means you can write it as

<br /> <br /> M^{uv} = \frac{1}{2} (M^{uv} - M^{vu})<br /> <br />
 
Last edited:
what level of quantum physics is this? grad?
 
waht said:
Check the right hand side of the equation, you can write


<br /> <br /> \delta\omega^\nu_\sigma = \delta\omega_{\rho\sigma} \eta^{\rho \nu} <br /> <br />
Of course! (Slapping myself right now...I should have seen it). Thanks!
 
thoughtgaze said:
what level of quantum physics is this? grad?
This is from a book on quantum field theory. You would normally study two books on quantum mechanics before this.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
Back
Top