Compare Ions: 1 Mol Nickel (II) vs 1 Mol Copper (I)

  • Thread starter Thread starter NewsboysGurl91
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
1 mol of nickel (II) contains a greater number of ions than 1 mol of copper (I), with calculations showing approximately 1.03 x 10^22 ions for nickel compared to 9.48 x 10^21 ions for copper. The discussion emphasizes that "moles" is a unit of quantity, similar to a dozen, and should be understood in terms of the number of entities present. The comparison is likened to evaluating which bag contains more items, reinforcing the concept of quantity rather than mass. The calculations provided clarify that the units should reflect ions per gram after canceling the mole units. Ultimately, nickel (II) has more ions than copper (I) in equivalent mole quantities.
NewsboysGurl91
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
Which will have the greater number of ions, 1 mol of nickel (II) or 1 mol of copper (I)?



2. No equations



3. Nickel: 1 mol/58.69 g of Ni * 6.022*10^23 ions/ 1 mol = 1.03 * 10^22 ions.

Copper: 1 mol/ 63.55 g of Cu * 6.022 * 10^23 ions/ 1 mol = 9.48 * 10 ^ 21 ions.

Nickel will have the greater number of ions. Is this correct?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This is like asking "Which bag will have more items, one with a dozen tennis balls or one with a dozen ping pong balls?"

Remember that "moles" is really a number (like dozen is a number) referring to how many of a certain thing.
 
Think your two calculations should have the units of "ions/gm", not just "ions", after you cancel both "mole" units.

This and chemisttree's info should lead you to the correct answer.

Good luck.

Steve
 
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top