Comparing AM and FM Broadcasting: Research Ideas

AI Thread Summary
Key research topics for comparing AM and FM broadcasting include the differences in RF wave propagation and how each interacts with the ionosphere. The modulation techniques used in AM and FM, along with their respective benefits and drawbacks, are crucial for understanding their performance. Additionally, factors such as broadcast range variations between day and night, channel bandwidth, and the impact of noise on signal quality should be examined. The inherent advantages of FM over AM, particularly in noise rejection and signal stability, are also significant points of discussion. Overall, a comprehensive analysis of these aspects will provide a robust comparison of AM and FM broadcasting.
HSV
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hey all

I have to do a massive physics report on the topic "a comparison of Am against FM broadcasting."

What are some topics i could research and compare.

Cheers
HSV
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF, HVC.
One main thing that you should look into is how the RF waves propagate. There is a difference as to how they interact with the ionosphere.
 
What level of physics is this for?

Regardless of that, the differences in their frequency bands and the different methods with which the two transmit data in should be main topics.
 
its for grade 12

so far I've got
the way they are differently modulated
how the modulations have their benefits and cons
and a bit on propagation

anything else important?
 
Other subjects might be
Broadcast range (night and day); attenuation in air
[I remember as a kid living in California and picking up AM stations in Texas and Pennsylvania at night]
(ionospheric effects mentioned above)
channel bandwidth; mono and stereo broadcasts
Use of vestigal sidebands (in FM) (carriers above audio in FM channel bandwidth)
Signal to noise (AM and FM) and bit error rate (in digital broadcasts)
Inherent benefit of FM over AM (noise rejection) (comparison of upper and lower sidebands)
Noise figures (kTB) of receivers at 1 MHz (AM) and 100 MHz (FM)
[kTB = Boltzmann's constant times temperature times bandwidth]
Zero power AM receivers (I built a crystal radio receiver about 1947)
 
As mentioned, it's mostly due to frequency differences in commercial AM versus FM broadcast. As I understand it, HAM radio operators can choose to use AM or FM on selected frequencies that range from 1.8 mhz to 275 ghz. The other differnce is that with AM radio the strength of the signal varies with amplitude, the sound wave is represented by the change in amplitude of an AM broadcast. In FM, the amplitude is constant, and the sound wave amplitude is represented as a deviation in frequency from the main frequency. For stereo, a pair of frequencies is used.

The lower frequency AM radio stations can bounce off the upper atmosphere, especially at night. In the days when AM radio was popular for music, KOMA, at 50,000 watts, in Oklahoma could be heard just about anywhere not blocked by the Rocky Mountanins to the west. XERB, with a 50,000 watt transmitter "aimed" northward from Mexico, (studio was in Las Vegas, remember Wolf Man Jack?), could be heard just about anywhere in California.

Low frequency, low power, HAM radio signals can be receiived cross continent occasionally.
 
comparing a flat solar panel of area 2π r² and a hemisphere of the same area, the hemispherical solar panel would only occupy the area π r² of while the flat panel would occupy an entire 2π r² of land. wouldn't the hemispherical version have the same area of panel exposed to the sun, occupy less land space and can therefore increase the number of panels one land can have fitted? this would increase the power output proportionally as well. when I searched it up I wasn't satisfied with...
Back
Top