Comparing Bragg Reflections of Cesium, Cesium Chloride and Cesium Iodide

  • Thread starter Thread starter captainjack2000
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on predicting the intensities of Bragg reflections in x-ray diffraction patterns for cesium, cesium chloride, and cesium iodide. The intensity is influenced by the structure factor, which is proportional to the number of electrons in the atoms involved. Given the atomic numbers of cesium (55), chlorine (17), and iodine (53), cesium is expected to contribute the most to the scattering intensity due to its higher atomic number. The participants express uncertainty about applying the structure factor equation to derive the expected intensity comparisons. Understanding the relationship between atomic number and scattering intensity is crucial for analyzing the x-ray diffraction patterns of these compounds.
captainjack2000
Messages
96
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


How would you expect the intensities of the Bragg reflections in the x-ray diffraction patterns of cesium, cesium chloride and cesium iodide to compare? (The atomic numbers of cesium, chlorine and iodine are 55, 17 and 53 respectively_


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


I am really unsure how to do this question at all. The first part of this question delt with structure factors so I know that the scattering intensity I=Io A (S)^2 where S is the structure factor. Not sure how this helps?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The structure factor is proportional to the number of electrons in the atom (or the atomic number if the atom is uncharged).
 
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top