Comparing Drag in Still vs. Flowing Water: A Physics Experiment

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on a physics experiment measuring drag on floating models in both still and flowing water, using shape, wetted surface, and velocity as variables. The experiment involves a flume tank setup where models are connected to a hanging bucket to quantify drag force. A key question raised is whether the drag on an immobile object in flowing water is equivalent to that in still water, with responses indicating that this assumption is valid if only water drag is considered, excluding wind resistance. Clarifications were made regarding the use of pennies, which serve to weigh down the models and increase wetted surface area. Overall, the experiment aims to isolate and understand the effects of water flow on drag.
BiteTheDust
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
For a physics experiment, I'm testing the drag experienced by floating models with shape, wetted surface, and velocity as the independent variables.

I placed the models in a flume tank and connected them to a hanging bucket via a string that passed over a frictionless pulley (see attached pictures). By adding or removing pennies, I sought to immobilize the bucket in the air. Once this was achieved, the drag force of each model would then be the mass of bucket + pennies x gravity.

My question is can I safely assume that the drag experienced by an immobile object in flowing water is the same as the drag experienced by the same object moving through still water?

Thanks in advance for any feedback.
 

Attachments

  • IMG_5860.jpg
    IMG_5860.jpg
    28.7 KB · Views: 531
  • IMG_5898.jpg
    IMG_5898.jpg
    55.2 KB · Views: 557
  • IMG_5861.jpg
    IMG_5861.jpg
    32.2 KB · Views: 495
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org


BiteTheDust said:
My question is can I safely assume that the drag experienced by an immobile object in flowing water is the same as the drag experienced by the same object moving through still water?

It is safe to assume that as long as you only consider the drag between the object and the water. A moving object would also experience wind resistance. Other than that there is no difference.

One thing I would like to point out is that the pictures seem to show that the pennies are being used to weigh down the object rather than to determine the drag its experiencing.
 


Thanks for the response. I think I'm going to ignore the air resistance since it is relatively insignificant in the total resistance experienced by a moving object in water.

Oh and sorry for the confusion with the pennies. The pennies I am referring to are found in the bucket under the pulley (see the third picture I just uploaded).
In the second picture they are indeed use to weigh down the model and thereby increase the wetted surface of the models.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...

Similar threads

Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
10K
Replies
39
Views
14K
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
27
Views
10K
Back
Top