Comparing the Behaviors of Electron, Muon & Tau Neutrinos

quasar987
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Gold Member
Messages
4,796
Reaction score
32
How are the electron neutrino, the muon neutrino and the tau neutrino different from each other (except for the leptonic number they carry)?

I heard they BEHAVE like their associated Lepton (el., muon, tau). If so, in what way?

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
quasar987 said:
I heard they BEHAVE like their associated Lepton (el., muon, tau). If so, in what way?

That would be VERY strange considering that the neutrinos have NO charge, while their "associated leptons" do.

Zz.
 
Although they are all very light, the different neutrinos have different masses.
 
quasar987 said:
How are the electron neutrino, the muon neutrino and the tau neutrino different from each other (except for the leptonic number they carry)?

I heard they BEHAVE like their associated Lepton (el., muon, tau). If so, in what way?

Thanks.
They form an isospin doublet together with the associated lepton.
 
Thread 'Why is there such a difference between the total cross-section data? (simulation vs. experiment)'
Well, I'm simulating a neutron-proton scattering phase shift. The equation that I solve numerically is the Phase function method and is $$ \frac{d}{dr}[\delta_{i+1}] = \frac{2\mu}{\hbar^2}\frac{V(r)}{k^2}\sin(kr + \delta_i)$$ ##\delta_i## is the phase shift for triplet and singlet state, ##\mu## is the reduced mass for neutron-proton, ##k=\sqrt{2\mu E_{cm}/\hbar^2}## is the wave number and ##V(r)## is the potential of interaction like Yukawa, Wood-Saxon, Square well potential, etc. I first...
Toponium is a hadron which is the bound state of a valance top quark and a valance antitop quark. Oversimplified presentations often state that top quarks don't form hadrons, because they decay to bottom quarks extremely rapidly after they are created, leaving no time to form a hadron. And, the vast majority of the time, this is true. But, the lifetime of a top quark is only an average lifetime. Sometimes it decays faster and sometimes it decays slower. In the highly improbable case that...
I'm following this paper by Kitaev on SL(2,R) representations and I'm having a problem in the normalization of the continuous eigenfunctions (eqs. (67)-(70)), which satisfy \langle f_s | f_{s'} \rangle = \int_{0}^{1} \frac{2}{(1-u)^2} f_s(u)^* f_{s'}(u) \, du. \tag{67} The singular contribution of the integral arises at the endpoint u=1 of the integral, and in the limit u \to 1, the function f_s(u) takes on the form f_s(u) \approx a_s (1-u)^{1/2 + i s} + a_s^* (1-u)^{1/2 - i s}. \tag{70}...

Similar threads

Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
87
Views
18K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
1K
Back
Top