Complex Analysis - Taylor series of 1/(1+exp(z))

In summary, the first four terms of the Taylor series of \frac{1}{1+e^{z}} at z_{0}=0 are \frac{1}{2}-\frac{z}{4}+\frac{z^{3}}{48}-\frac{z^{5}}{480}+... and its radius of convergence is \pi. When substituting one series expansion into another, it is necessary to expand both series to the same order for the method to work correctly.
  • #1
LoA
13
0

Homework Statement



Compute the first four terms of the Taylor series of [itex] \frac{1}{1+e^{z}} [/itex] at [itex] z_{0} = 0[/itex] and give it's radius of convergence.

Homework Equations



[itex] e^{z} = \sum\frac{z^{n}}{n!} = 1 + z +\frac{z^{2}}{2!} + \frac{z^{3}}{3!} + o(z^{3}) [/itex]

[itex] \frac{1}{1+w} = \sum(-1)^{n}w^{n} = 1 - w + w^{2} - w^{3} + o(w^{3}) [/itex]

The Attempt at a Solution



First let's look at the radius of convergence. Since [itex] e^{z} [/itex] converges for all z, the only thing that matters is [itex] \left|w\right| < 1 [/itex] where [itex] w = e^{z} [/itex].

So I have to solve [itex] \left|e^{z}\right| < 1 [/itex]. Easy enough. (or just observe that exp(z) = -1 when z = iπ)

[itex] -1 < e^{z} < 1 \Rightarrow Log(-1) < z < Log(1) \Rightarrow -i\pi < z < 0 \Rightarrow \left|z\right| < \left|i\pi\right| = \pi [/itex]

So the series will converge for [itex] \left|z\right| < \pi [/itex]

So much for that. Now down to brass tacks, computing the terms. Working out the derivatives at [itex] z_{0} = 0 [/itex] (and double checking with wolfram) gives me:

[itex] \frac{1}{2} - \frac{z}{4} + \frac{z^{3}}{48} - \frac{z^{5}}{480} +... [/itex]

But when I try to arrive at the same form by subbing the series for exp(z) into the geometric series, I get something A) different, and B) messy. I'll write it out upon request, but not tonight, I've been at this way too long. My suspicion is that in order to get the first four terms that way would require way more algebra than it's worth, but I'd like to at least figure out if I'm on the right track...

Questions: Do I need to expand the terms to a higher order? When substituting the series expansion for one function into the series expansion of another, is it necessary to expand each series out to the exact same order? We worked a few problems like this in class the other day, computing things like [itex] e^{sin(z^{2})} [/itex] and I thought I understood at the time, but now I'm not quite so sure...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
I think its better to expand [itex] \frac{1}{1+e^z} [/itex] directly!
 
  • #3
LoA said:

Homework Statement



Compute the first four terms of the Taylor series of [itex] \frac{1}{1+e^{z}} [/itex] at [itex] z_{0} = 0[/itex] and give it's radius of convergence.

Homework Equations



[itex] e^{z} = \sum\frac{z^{n}}{n!} = 1 + z +\frac{z^{2}}{2!} + \frac{z^{3}}{3!} + o(z^{3}) [/itex]

[itex] \frac{1}{1+w} = \sum(-1)^{n}w^{n} = 1 - w + w^{2} - w^{3} + o(w^{3}) [/itex]

The Attempt at a Solution



First let's look at the radius of convergence. Since [itex] e^{z} [/itex] converges for all z, the only thing that matters is [itex] \left|w\right| < 1 [/itex] where [itex] w = e^{z} [/itex].

So I have to solve [itex] \left|e^{z}\right| < 1 [/itex]. Easy enough. (or just observe that exp(z) = -1 when z = iπ)

[itex] -1 < e^{z} < 1[/itex]
That doesn't make sense. Complex numbers can't be ordered like that.

[itex] \Rightarrow Log(-1) < z < Log(1) \Rightarrow -i\pi < z < 0 \Rightarrow \left|z\right| < \left|i\pi\right| = \pi [/itex]

So the series will converge for [itex] \left|z\right| < \pi [/itex]
Think about this. You're saying, for example, that if ##z=3 < \pi##, then ##e^z = e^3 < 1##.

Try using ##e^z = e^{x+iy} = e^x e^{iy}##.

So much for that. Now down to brass tacks, computing the terms. Working out the derivatives at [itex] z_{0} = 0 [/itex] (and double checking with wolfram) gives me:

[itex] \frac{1}{2} - \frac{z}{4} + \frac{z^{3}}{48} - \frac{z^{5}}{480} +... [/itex]

But when I try to arrive at the same form by subbing the series for exp(z) into the geometric series, I get something A) different, and B) messy. I'll write it out upon request, but not tonight, I've been at this way too long. My suspicion is that in order to get the first four terms that way would require way more algebra than it's worth, but I'd like to at least figure out if I'm on the right track...
I suspect you're writing ##1+e^z+(e^z)^2+\cdots## and substituting in the series for ##e^z##. That won't work because every term will contribute to all orders. You want to expand ##e^z## as a series in ##\frac{1}{1+e^z}##, and then expand the result as a geometric series.

Questions: Do I need to expand the terms to a higher order? When substituting the series expansion for one function into the series expansion of another, is it necessary to expand each series out to the exact same order? We worked a few problems like this in class the other day, computing things like [itex] e^{sin(z^{2})} [/itex] and I thought I understood at the time, but now I'm not quite so sure...
 
  • #4
As for the radius of convergence, a power series for a function of a complex variable will converge as long as there "is no problem". Here, [itex]e^{i\pi}= -1[/itex] so that the denominator is 0. This function is not analytic at [itex]z= i\pi[/itex] but is for all z closer to 0 so its radius of convergence is [itex]\pi[/itex].
 
  • #5
LoA said:
[
Questions: Do I need to expand the terms to a higher order? When substituting the series expansion for one function into the series expansion of another, is it necessary to expand each series out to the exact same order? We worked a few problems like this in class the other day, computing things like [itex] e^{sin(z^{2})} [/itex] and I thought I understood at the time, but now I'm not quite so sure...

You can't just muscle-through long division huh?
 

1. What is a Taylor series?

A Taylor series is a mathematical series that represents a function as an infinite sum of terms. It is useful for approximating values of a function near a specific point.

2. How is a Taylor series derived?

A Taylor series is derived by taking the derivatives of a function at a specific point and using those values to form a polynomial. The more derivatives that are included, the more accurate the approximation will be.

3. What is the Taylor series for 1/(1+exp(z))?

The Taylor series for 1/(1+exp(z)) is given by 1 - exp(z) + exp(2z) - exp(3z) + .... This series is centered at z=0 and converges for all complex numbers z.

4. How is the Taylor series used in complex analysis?

The Taylor series is used in complex analysis to determine the behavior of complex functions near a specific point. It can be used to approximate the value of a function, as well as to analyze the convergence and differentiability of a function.

5. What are the applications of the Taylor series of 1/(1+exp(z))?

The Taylor series of 1/(1+exp(z)) has applications in various fields such as physics, engineering, and finance. It can be used to solve differential equations, analyze the behavior of electronic circuits, and model financial data. Additionally, it is used in the study of complex analysis and its applications in other branches of mathematics.

Similar threads

  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
418
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
537
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
17
Views
1K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
6
Views
477
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
259
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
711
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
16
Views
566
Back
Top