Complex Wave Vector in Partial Reflection at a Conductor Interface

_Andreas
Messages
141
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



I'm writing a school paper on the behavior of electromagnetic waves when they hit the interface between a non-conductor and a conductor. My question is if, in the case of partial reflection, it is correct to allow for both components of the wave vector (the wave is confined to a plane) of the transmitted wave to be complex (in the conductor, there is attenuation in both* directions, isn't it)?

* Of course, if the transmitted wave is orthogonal to the interface there is only one direction to consider.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If it is of any help, this is how I imagine the electric field vector of the transmitted wave (in the metal) should look: \textbf{E}_{0t}\exp i(k'_{xt}x+k'_{zt}z-\omega_t t)\exp(-k''_{xt}x)\exp(-k''_{zt}z),\label{17b}. The ' and '' denote the real and the imaginary parts of the wave vector components, respectively. (Ignore the direction signs. What I wonder is if he basic idea is correct).
 
No one? Please?
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top