Component Acceleration/Velocity

  • Thread starter Thread starter mathewings
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Component
AI Thread Summary
A sailboat initially traveling east at 4.10 m/s experiences an acceleration of 0.500 m/s² at an angle of 40.0° north of east due to a gust of wind. To find the boat's speed after 5.90 seconds, the velocity vector can be calculated using the equation v(t) = v₀ + a·t, incorporating both the initial velocity and the components of acceleration. By substituting the time into the equation, the resulting velocity vector can be determined, from which the speed (magnitude) can be derived. The discussion emphasizes the importance of breaking down the acceleration into its vector components for accurate calculations. This approach effectively resolves the problem of determining the boat's speed after the gust subsides.
mathewings
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
The problem is stated as follows:

A sailboat is traveling east at 4.10 m/s. A sudden gust of wind gives the boat an acceleration a=(0.500 m/s2,40.0° north of east). What is the boat's speed 5.90 s later when the gust subsides?

I've tried breaking it into component vectors, but no luck. Suggestions?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
mathewings said:
The problem is stated as follows:

A sailboat is traveling east at 4.10 m/s. A sudden gust of wind gives the boat an acceleration a=(0.500 m/s2,40.0° north of east). What is the boat's speed 5.90 s later when the gust subsides?

I've tried breaking it into component vectors, but no luck. Suggestions?

It's easier to write down the whole vectors. So, \vec{v}(t) = \vec{v}_{0}+\vec{a}\cdot t = 4.1 \vec{i} + (0.5\cos(40) \vec{i} + 0.5\sin(40) \vec{j})t. Plug in t = 5.9 and you'll have your velocity vector. (The speed is it's magnitude.)
 
what are the equations you are using?
 
I totally understand your formula; I made the proper substitutions and it works. Thanks.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top