Components using partial derivatives

transgalactic
Messages
1,386
Reaction score
0
here is the question:
http://i44.tinypic.com/xe53tc.gif

here is the solution:
http://i43.tinypic.com/2nuokfq.gif
my first question regarding this whole thing is.
why when the doing the partial derivative by "r" we don't multiply by minus
the formula says (minus derivative)
but all they do is making a derivative without multiplying by minus?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi transgalactic! :smile:
transgalactic said:
here is the question:
http://i43.tinypic.com/2nuokfq.jpg

here is the solution:
http://i43.tinypic.com/2nuokfq.gif

erm :redface: … they're the same :confused:

get some sleep! :zzz:​
why when the doing the partial derivative by "r" we don't multiply by minus
the formula says (minus derivative)
but all they do is making a derivative without multiplying by minus?

?? :confused: but they have multiplied by the minus …

∂/∂r (1/r2) = -2/r3, and ∂/∂θ (cosθ) = -sinθ :smile:
 
but we are doing a derivative by 'r'(partial derivative)
we don't touch \theta ,its constant
 
Last edited:
i changed the original post
now its ok
 
transgalactic said:
but we are doing a derivative by 'r'(partial derivative)
we don't touch \theta ,its constant

ok, but still ∂/∂r (1/r2) = -2/r3 :smile:
 
thanks
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top