Compressed air at high pressure can cause frostbite?

AI Thread Summary
Compressed air can indeed cause frostbite due to the Joule-Thomson effect, where expanding air cools significantly. A substantial pressure difference can lead to a pronounced cooling effect, resulting in ice formation, as observed with CO2 fire extinguishers. This phenomenon occurs because the rapid expansion of compressed air lowers its temperature, potentially leading to skin damage. Users should be cautious when handling compressed air at high pressures to avoid frostbite. Understanding these risks is essential for safe usage.
wils0645
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Is it possible to get frostbite from compressed air? How does this happen?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The expanding air cools ( Joule-Thomson effect)
If you have a big pressure difference the cooling effect can be very large - you get ice forming even on a CO2 fire extinguisher.
 
Thanks, I appreciate it. I was curious.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top