Compute acceleration and tension in the cord

AI Thread Summary
A cord over a frictionless pulley connects a 4.0 kg object and a 12 kg object, prompting calculations for tension and acceleration. The expected acceleration is 4.9 m/s², derived from the net forces acting on both masses. The tension equations for each mass lead to a consistent solution, confirming that the acceleration is half of the gravitational acceleration due to the mass difference. The tension in the cord is calculated to be 58.8 N, aligning with the derived acceleration. This problem illustrates the balance of forces and the impact of mass on acceleration in a pulley system.
skysunsand
Messages
38
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A cord passing over a frictionless, massless pulley has a 4.0 kg object tied to one end and a 12 kg object tied to the other. Compute the tension and acceleration in the cord.


Right now, I'm just trying to calculate the acceleration. It is supposed to be 4.9 m/s^2

Homework Equations



F=ma
T1=T2=0
T1-mg=ma
T2-mg=ma


The Attempt at a Solution



For the 4kg block-

F=ma
T1-mg = ma

T1-39.2 = 4a
Solving in terms of T1 to get
T1= 4a+39.2

For the 12kg block-
F=ma
T2-mg = ma

T2-117.6= 12a
Solving in terms of T2-
T2= 12a+ 117.6

Now, because T1=T2, I can say

12a+ 117.6 = 4a+ 39.2
But then I end up with a=9.8.

The answer is 4.9, which, incidentally, is 9.8/2.

Do I have to divide by 2 because I have two cords? Or is there some other reason I am missing?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Assuming the following is correct can you solve for T and a?
 

Attachments

  • aaaaa109.jpg
    aaaaa109.jpg
    8.8 KB · Views: 1,355
Spinnor said:
Assuming the following is correct can you solve for T and a?

Yeah, you'd set T=4a + 4g , plug that into the other equation for T, to get

12g+(-4a-4g) = 12a
to get
8g=16a
8*9.8 = 16a

a=4.9

Ah. I must have screwed up somewhere in my algebra.

Thank you!
 
skysunsand said:
The answer is 4.9, which, incidentally, is 9.8/2.

Do I have to divide by 2 because I have two cords? Or is there some other reason I am missing?

co-incidence almost.

One way to view this: the weight of a 4 kg mass is pulling one way, and the weight of a 12 kg mass is pulling the other way.

If you consider the weight of the 4 kg mass cancells out [balances if you like] 4 of the other 12, we have a net force equal to the weight of an 8kg mass to accelerate this system - which has a total mass of 16 kg.

Now the weight of a 16 kg mass will accelerate a 16kg mass at 9.8 ms-2, so we would expect that half that weight would achieve only half that acceleration → 4.9 ms-2
 
Another way to solve this problem is to use just two directions for forces. It may sound crazy, but I have seen this procedure in two or more textbooks.
The positive direction would the direction of motion (the direction of falling of the 12-kg block). This way, if m1 is the 12-kg block, and m2 is the 4-kg block, we would have the following system of equations (each equation for a separate free-body diagram):

-T + m1g = m1a
T - m2g = m2a

I got 58.8 N for tension, and 4.9 m/s^2 for acceleration ;)
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanged mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top