Compute Electric Field from Electric Currents

ggeo1
Messages
61
Reaction score
0
Hello,

I have this equation that computes the electric field from electric currents.

E=-j*k_n (J*C_1- (J*R|R*C_2) e^ -j*k*R/4πR )

The data are:

k_n=377 , k=20.93 , R=Sqrt(3) ,J_x=0.72576821 ,J_y=0.03763659 , J_z=0.86104220 ,
C_1=0.999239077741 + 1 / 36.2518234024j
C_2=0.997717233223+ 3 / 36.25182344024j

R_x=R_y=R_z=0.57735026919


I have 3 questions.

1) From the above equation i must compute E_x ,E_y,E_z.
When i compute E_x i will compute J_x*C_1 - (J*R|R*C_2) ?
And specific: I will compute the J*R dot product as : J*R=J_x*R_x+J_y*R_y+J_z*R_z ?
Or only the J*R=J_x*R_x ?

2) The computation J*R|R*C_2 . How will i do the computation for the symbol ' | ' ?
I will compute the dot product , then the R_x*C_2 and then what?How to compute the whole
J*R|R*C_2 ?

3) How to deal with the C_1 and C_2? I mean they have the imaginary part in the denominator.What is the best approach?

Thank you!
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
What does the symbol "|" represent? It does not look like standard notation.

C_2 is a scalar? In this case, both J*R and C_2 are scalars, and I would assume that you can just perform a scalar multiplication with your vector.

When i compute E_x i will compute J_x*C_1 - (J*R|R*C_2) ?
Don't forget the exponential which is multiplied with the latter term.

And specific: I will compute the J*R dot product as : J*R=J_x*R_x+J_y*R_y+J_z*R_z ?
You should do this, right.

3) How to deal with the C_1 and C_2? I mean they have the imaginary part in the denominator.What is the best approach?
1/10 does not look high, but I would perform the whole calculation with complex numbers. If the result is not real, try to find an interpretation - maybe you can simply drop the imaginary part.
 
Hello and thanks for the help.

C_1 and C_2 are scalars.

So, ok J*R=..=scalar.

But i can't understand how to do the (J*R|R*C_2) .
I will compute the J*R and then the R*C_2 , and then what?
 
I think it's

((J*R) *C_2 )*R , where R i will put R_x?

Then for E_y i will put R_y?
 
I would try to just multiply them as scalar*vector.

(\vec{J}*\vec{R}|\vec{R}*C_2) \stackrel{?}{=} \left(C_2 (\vec{J}*\vec{R})\right) \vec{R}

Edit:
I think it's

((J*R) *C_2 )*R , where R i will put R_x?

Then for E_y i will put R_y?
Should work.
It is speculative, and maybe you should check where the formula comes from.
 
Ok , thanks!
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top