Computing the Inverse Laplace Transform

audifanatic51
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
Hi, I recently posted another question about a Laplace transform and now have a question about taking the inverse Laplace transform. Again, my professor did not cover this topic as well as I could have hoped for, and so I am stuck on this problem as well. Again, I understand the idea of Laplace transforms (and their inverses) very well, however actually computing them seems to be another issue. Anyway, here is the problem.

2502qz9.png


I saw a definition in the book that seemed like it could be useful, however, when I tried to implement it, things seemed to get ugly. Here's the definition I found:

\ell^{-1} \left\{\stackrel{F(s)}{s}\right\} = \int^{t}_{0} f(\tau) d\tau

Please note that due to my typing incompetency, I cannot figure out how to make fractions with the forum tools. That should be F(s)/s in the inverse Laplace transform brackets above.

Any help or step in the right direction would be appreciated. thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Since you have that formula, you observe in your problem that F(s)=(1-exp(-s))/(1+exp(-s)), which can be inverted by a little manipulation (and table look up). Then F(s)/s is inverted by integrating f(tau).
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top