Concept for Black Hole explaination

Noja888
Messages
62
Reaction score
0
Me and my brother - the armchair physicist that we are came up with this! We are interested if the professional community has any concepts of this nature. Here we go...

Newtonian physics provides a framework of concepts to explain reality at what you could call our 'normal' level of measured reality. Another way to loosely say it - what we experience with our own senses without technological assistance.

Then comes GR and QM. Both explain observed reality on a larger/smaller scale. These scales of measurement - especially with QM - is not normally observed from the Newtonian set of laws. We do not notice all the quantum interactions as we watch t.v. When astronauts orbit the Earth they do not notice the time-dilation difference. But these things are measurable.

I think of it as different theories having different applications depending on the scale involved.

Now with all the different approaches that have been taken to explain a black hole nothing has yet given us a full explanation. Would you need a new set of mathematical constructs to explain a black holes' true behavior? Like the Newtonian Laws that have no compensation for the effects of gravity and motion with regard to GR. Would a new tier of concepts need to be introduced? GR breaks down when you examine black hole so...does this warrant an idea like this? Are their any fringe theories with this sort of concept in mind?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
GR tells us most things about black-holes. The singularity in the center, however, remains elusive. For this, entirely new theories and mathematics seem to be required. This is a very active area of research, things like 'string theory,' 'quantum gravity' etc etc.
 
Thanks for the reading material atyy. Checking it out now.
 
Thread 'LQG Legend Writes Paper Claiming GR Explains Dark Matter Phenomena'
A new group of investigators are attempting something similar to Deur's work, which seeks to explain dark matter phenomena with general relativity corrections to Newtonian gravity is systems like galaxies. Deur's most similar publication to this one along these lines was: One thing that makes this new paper notable is that the corresponding author is Giorgio Immirzi, the person after whom the somewhat mysterious Immirzi parameter of Loop Quantum Gravity is named. I will be reviewing the...
I seem to notice a buildup of papers like this: Detecting single gravitons with quantum sensing. (OK, old one.) Toward graviton detection via photon-graviton quantum state conversion Is this akin to “we’re soon gonna put string theory to the test”, or are these legit? Mind, I’m not expecting anyone to read the papers and explain them to me, but if one of you educated people already have an opinion I’d like to hear it. If not please ignore me. EDIT: I strongly suspect it’s bunk but...
https://arxiv.org/pdf/2503.09804 From the abstract: ... Our derivation uses both EE and the Newtonian approximation of EE in Part I, to describe semi-classically in Part II the advection of DM, created at the level of the universe, into galaxies and clusters thereof. This advection happens proportional with their own classically generated gravitational field g, due to self-interaction of the gravitational field. It is based on the universal formula ρD =λgg′2 for the densityρ D of DM...

Similar threads

Back
Top