Do Balls Thrown Up and Dropped Down Meet Above the Halfway Point of a Building?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on whether two balls, one dropped from the top of a building and the other thrown upward from the ground with the same initial speed, cross paths above, below, or at the halfway point of the building. It is established that the dropped ball accelerates downward while the thrown ball decelerates upward, leading to the conclusion that they will meet above the halfway point. The participants emphasize the importance of kinematic equations to analyze the motion of both balls and determine their respective positions over time. A mathematical approach is suggested to confirm the intersection point in relation to the building's height. The conclusion is that the balls will cross paths above the halfway point, supported by both conceptual reasoning and potential mathematical verification.
UMich1344
Messages
26
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A ball is dropped from rest from the top of a building and strikes the ground with a speed vf. From ground level, a second ball is thrown straight upward at the same instant that the first ball is dropped. The initial speed of the second ball is v0 = vf, the same speed with which the first ball will eventually strike the ground. Ignoring air resistance, decide whether the balls cross paths at half the height of the building, above the halfway point, or below the halfway point. Give your reasoning.

Homework Equations



Kinematics equations.

The Attempt at a Solution



Strictly conceptually, we know that when something is thrown up, its initial velocity is greater than its final velocity (at its peak). When something is dropped, its initial velocity is less than its final velocity (at the ground).

We can conclude that when an object travels with a greater velocity over a certain amount of time than a second object does, the larger the displacement of the first object will be.

When something is dropped, it speeds up as its displacement becomes larger. On the other hand, when something is thrown up, it slows down as its displacement becomes larger.

With this reasoning we can conclude that the balls will cross paths above the halfway point of the building because the ball that is thrown up will have a greater displacement than the ball that is dropped when they cross paths.

Is that correct?

I want to back up my answer with some math work too. However, I'm not sure how to go about it. I know I can refer to the height of the building as h and then solve for the point at which the two balls cross and compare my answer to h in order to see if the point is greater than 0.5h. I just don't know exactly how to set it up.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi UMich1344, yeh I think you logical conclusions are fine there so that's looks. So this does in fact again simply boil down to our lovely equations of motion (for constant acceleration :D).

So first we need to determine when our properties of each ball, so well call the balled dropped ball A and the ball thrown up ball B:

Ball A:
- u = 0 ms-1
- s = s m
- t = t
- a = -9.8 ms-2

now notice that we don't have a final velocity of actual values for s or t, that's because we want and equation of displacement at time t. (just as a note, actually these equations will not give relative displacement to the balls initial positions, but give and position vertically :D)

Now we should also note that the initial position of Ball A is at h if we consider that the bottom of the building is the origin of our coordinate system, if we call the height of the building h, so we end up with equations:

s = ut + \frac{1}{2}at^2 + s_i

note that we have si at the end, they are not part of the standard equations of motion you will most likely learn, but is simply the initial position, as in most cases the inital position is 0.

x_A(t) = -4.9t^2 + h

Now for B:
- u = vf ms-1
- s = s m
- t = t
- a = -9.8 ms-2

so we get:

x_B(t) = {v_f}t -4.9t^2

now we want to find the point where they meet each other so we can say that:

x_A(t) = x_B(t)

that will yield a value for t (have a go at finding it :D). now obviously that is no good, we want to find a value for the position at which they meet in terms of h.

For that we simply substitute the value back into one of our equations for the position of a ball, it doesn't matter which one as both will give the same result (you can check that for yourself if you like)

Now at this point you may find it a little strange, as if you have done it all correctly, you will fin that you value of t was in terms of h and vf and therefore you value of the position will also be in terms of them, but well don't want vf so how do we get rid of it.

Well again we go back to our equations of motion. vf is equal to the speed when ball A has fallen a distance h under the influence of gravity or:

v^2 = u^2 + 2as
v_f^2 = 2(-9.8)(-h)
v_f^2 = 19.6h

note that this time h is given as being negative, as this time we are not dealing with an coordinate system relative to a common origin, we are simply finding a final velocity with a displacement relative to the object, and the displacement is down so negative if this case.
so see if you can now use this final equation to get a value for the position of the balls in terms of h :D have fun
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top