Conceptual Question on Parallel Plate Capacitors

AI Thread Summary
When two capacitors are connected in parallel with opposite plates joined, the charges on the plates interact, leading to a net charge difference. The final voltage across C1 is calculated using the formula V = (Q1 - Q2) / (C1 + C2), where Q1 and Q2 are the charges on the capacitors. The subtraction of charges occurs due to conservation of charge, resulting in a redistribution of voltage across the capacitors. The final voltage is reported as positive because it reflects the potential difference after charge redistribution, despite the initial charges being of opposite signs. Understanding this behavior is crucial for analyzing parallel capacitor circuits.
waters
Messages
27
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Two capacitors, C1 and C2, are separately charged to 166 C and 348 C, respectively. They are then attached in parallel so that the + plate of one goes to the - plate of the other, and vice versa, as shown on the diagram below (notice how C2 was rotated 180 degrees before the capacitors were connected). C1 has a capacitance of 39.8 F, and C2 has a capacitance of 174 F. What is the final voltage across C1?

http://lon-capa.mines.edu/res/csm/csmphyslib/type56_capacitors/AttachedInParallel.jpg

Homework Equations


V(C1+C2) = Q1 - Q2
V = (Q1-Q2)/(C1+C2)
V = .851 V

The Attempt at a Solution



My question is, why are the charges subtracted? What goes on in this circuit to make that happen? Why does this happen when capacitors are aligned in this manner? Also, why is the final voltage reported as positive, when it should be negative?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
"Authorization Required" to your link.

ehild
 
Sorry about that. It should be fine now.
 

Attachments

  • AttachedInParallel.jpg
    AttachedInParallel.jpg
    8.1 KB · Views: 644
When the capacitors are connected, the "circuit" is really two disconnected halves--a top half and a bottom half. It follows from conservation of charge that on the top half, with AD, you have +Q1 from C1 and -Q2 from C2, and the opposite charge on the BC half. This charge will redistribute itself over the plates so that the new voltages for the capacitors are the same (as is required for a parallel circuit), but the net charge Q1-Q2 cannot change.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top