Conceptual short circuit diode / zero-bias base collector junction BJT question

AI Thread Summary
When a diode is short-circuited, zero current flows due to the balance between drift and diffusion currents, despite the barrier potential. In an NPN bipolar junction transistor (BJT) with a forward-biased base-emitter junction and a zero-biased base-collector junction, current can still flow because the influx of electrons from the emitter disrupts the normal charge carrier gradient, eliminating the diffusion current that would typically balance the drift current. The collector current (Ic) is influenced by the forward bias (Vbe), which increases Ic significantly beyond the drift current. The Ebers-Moll model highlights that both terms in the equation must be considered, especially as the device approaches saturation. Understanding these dynamics is crucial for analyzing BJT behavior in various operating conditions.
Only a Mirage
Messages
57
Reaction score
0
Why exactly is there zero current flowing through a diode when it is short circuited, given the presence of the barrier potential? My current understanding is that the drift current precisely balances the diffusion current. But if you take a diode and short it with a wire, wouldn't you then also have charges "diffusing" in the direction opposite to the junction (the normal direction of diffusion), at least giving rise to a transient current?

Related to this zero bias question, consider a simple NPN bipolar junction transistor circuit with the base-emitter junction forward biased and the base-collector junction zero-biased, with some load connected between the collector and emitter. The transport model equation under these conditions for Ic is Ic = Is(exp(Vbe/Vt) - 1). So in this case, there is current across a "shorted diode". But why? The best i can come up with is that the electrons flowing from the emitter into the base region eliminate the normal gradient of charge carriers in the "diode" so that there is no diffusion current to balance the drift current. (But Ic is a lot larger than the normal drift current because it depends on Vbe here?)

This was confusing to me because initially, I thought that since the base-collector junction was shorted, all current should simply "bypass" this junction, flowing through the short instead. My semiconductor devices teacher wasn't sure when I asked him, and any insight would be appreciated.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Ic = alpha_n*Ies*(exp((Vbe/Vt)-1) - alpha_i*Ics*(exp((Vbc/Vt)-1).

The above is the complete Ebers-Moll representation of the bjt. In active or cutoff mode, the 2nd term is negligible. But as the device enters saturation, i.e. Vbc approaches or positively exceeds zero, then the 2nd term must be retained.

Claude
 
Also, remember that the diode equation of Shockley, Id = Is*(exp((Vd/Vt)-1), cannot be directly applied to the b-c junction of a bjt because 2 things are happening. SDE (Shockley diode equation) applies for 2 terminals and anode current = cathode current. Having 3 terminals & 2 junctions complicates things.

THe collector current is not simply Ic = Ics*(exp((Vbc/Vt)-1), because the collector is collecting electrons from the emitter, for an npn device. The forward bias on the b-e junction results in lare numbers of electrons moving from emitter to base. But the base is so thin they don't stay in the base & recombine with holes, only a few do, but keep going to the collector. The E field from collector to base attracts these electrons.

That is why you need to look at both terms in the Ebers-Moll equations.

Claude
 
Thread 'Weird near-field phenomenon I get in my EM simulation'
I recently made a basic simulation of wire antennas and I am not sure if the near field in my simulation is modeled correctly. One of the things that worry me is the fact that sometimes I see in my simulation "movements" in the near field that seems to be faster than the speed of wave propagation I defined (the speed of light in the simulation). Specifically I see "nodes" of low amplitude in the E field that are quickly "emitted" from the antenna and then slow down as they approach the far...
Hello dear reader, a brief introduction: Some 4 years ago someone started developing health related issues, apparently due to exposure to RF & ELF related frequencies and/or fields (Magnetic). This is currently becoming known as EHS. (Electromagnetic hypersensitivity is a claimed sensitivity to electromagnetic fields, to which adverse symptoms are attributed.) She experiences a deep burning sensation throughout her entire body, leaving her in pain and exhausted after a pulse has occurred...
Back
Top