Concervation and Corresopndence Law

  • Thread starter Thread starter yquantum
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Law
AI Thread Summary
The discussion explores the complexities of the quantum world, suggesting that our mass confines us within a four-dimensional space, influencing the speed of light and electron behavior. It highlights the role of extra dimensions in string theory, which are essential for its validity and interact with our space. While physicists acknowledge the existence of these dimensions, they typically do not use them to explain quantum phenomena like uncertainty. The concept of wave-particle duality may eventually be clarified through advancements in string theory, which aims to derive particle behavior from fundamental string dynamics. Overall, the ideas presented are not considered crazy, but the prevailing scientific approach focuses on different frameworks for understanding quantum mechanics.
yquantum
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Dear Sir
It would be a understatement even to try and explain how strange the quantum world is.
But is it not possible that we are by our own mass held within a four dimension space and that is why (c) can only go 300,000 klm per/sec because of relativity mass and why electorn can not crash in on the necleus, we quote, Pauli, Heisenberg, Bohr, Einstein, but the true be know we can not get out of the BOX. Higher dimension is not something above us but it is all all around us. Electrons and Proton and even Photons they exist in many dimensions and that could explain one case in point duality and the atom make up, could you please let me know if crazy would be my trouble, or if by chance the Quantum World will not be explain in our life time.
yquantum
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF and the MKaku forum, yquantum,

You are basically correct about the dimensions. If we accept string physics, it HAS to have the extra dimensions to work at all. And yes they contact us at every point of our space.

Physicists do not use the extra dimensions to explain quantum properties like uncertainty; it seems better to take it as something nature gives us, a basic fact on which we build all our theories, including strings.

Wave-particle duality may eventually be explained by a theory derived from strings that replaces both particles and waves with the behavior of more basic things, such as strings or their multidimensional siblings, branes. It is hoped by string physicists that they can create predictions of ordinary particle behavior, like electrons and photons, out of "stringy" precursors. This is still a work in progress.

It is not at all crazy to think along the lines you have, but physicists have found it more productive to think along the lines I have described.
 
So I know that electrons are fundamental, there's no 'material' that makes them up, it's like talking about a colour itself rather than a car or a flower. Now protons and neutrons and quarks and whatever other stuff is there fundamentally, I want someone to kind of teach me these, I have a lot of questions that books might not give the answer in the way I understand. Thanks

Similar threads

Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
25
Views
5K
Replies
7
Views
12K
Replies
43
Views
9K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
0
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Back
Top