Conducting slab between a parallel-plate-capacitor

  • Thread starter Thread starter Tufts
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Conducting
AI Thread Summary
A conducting slab inserted between the plates of a parallel-plate capacitor divides the capacitor into two sections, but it behaves differently than initially assumed. The correct approach involves recognizing that the slab creates two capacitors in parallel, not in series, leading to the capacitance formula C_eq = ε₀A/(s - d). The position of the slab does not affect the overall capacitance, as the total distance between the plates remains constant. The discussion also highlights the importance of considering the permittivity of the slab when calculating capacitance. Understanding these concepts is crucial for solving similar problems effectively.
Tufts
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
This is a problem I found while studying for an exam I have next thursday, and conceptually it doesn't make any sense for me!

NOTE - This is not a dieletrics problem.

Homework Statement


A conducting slab with a thickness d and area A is inserted into the space between the plates of a parallel-plate-capacitor with spacing s and area A. What is the value of the capacitance of the system?

Diagram of the system:

------------------------

//////////////////////////// < Conducter Slab (d wide, with area A)

------------------------


Homework Equations



C = \frac{\epsilon_{o}A}{d} (1)

Capacitors in parallel combination: C_{eq} = C_{1} + C_{2} (2)
Capacitors in series combination: \frac{1}{C_{eq}}= \frac{1}{C_{1}}+\frac{1}{C_{2}} (3)

The Attempt at a Solution


At first sight, I immediately identified this problem as a simple series capacitor combination problem. Why? The conducter slab inbetween the plates will divide the existing capacitor into two after reaching eletrostatic equilibrium, as in the diagram:

+Q
--------------------
< First capacitor
-Q
--------------------
///////////////////////
--------------------
+Q
< Second capacitor
--------------------
-Q

Since the slab is a conductor, it acts as a bridge or a conducting wire between these two capacitors. One capacitor after the other, seems to be series for me. Knowing that, I used equation 1 (where d = 2(s - d)) to find the individual values of the capacitors, and used it along with equation 3 to find the equivalent capacitor.

My answer: C_{eq} = \frac{\epsilon_{o}A}{4(s-d)}

Unfortunately that wasn't correct. The real answer was \frac{\epsilon_{o}A}{s-d} which after reverse engineering, used parallel combination instead of series. Like I said before, this doesn't make sense at all for me.

Can anyone explain this? I would appreciate any help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF!

Tufts said:
A conducting slab with a thickness d and area A is inserted into the space between the plates of a parallel-plate-capacitor with spacing s and area A. What is the value of the capacitance of the system?

Since the slab is a conductor, it acts as a bridge or a conducting wire between these two capacitors. One capacitor after the other, seems to be series for me. Knowing that, I used equation 1 (where d = 2(s - d)) …

Hi Tufts! Welcome to PF! :smile:

Isn't d = (s - d)/2?
 
Oh no! Silly me!

I guess I was thinking too hard on this question, and blatantly ignoring an obvious mistake. Thanks for noticing. I'm glad that at least my analysis of the system was correct.
 
The slab does not have to be in the middle. The nice thing is that the result does not depend on the position of the slab.
It would be interesting (and quite easy) to try to solve the problem in the general case.
I mean, take s1 and s2 as spacing for the two capacitors, with s1+s2=d-s
 
Well it makes sense why it would work for any position. If one of the distances get larger, the other one has to get smaller in the same proportion. This way the sum is always the same.
 
Now I'm doing some excercises on capacitors and I found a pretty similar one to this, and I this the answer given here is not correct (if I'm wrong, please tell me, because on this depends my exam result :-p ).

I think that we have to remember about the the permittivity of the slab (εr), because the electric field in the slab is different than in the capacitor.
So the capacitance will be:

C=\frac{\epsilon S}{d-b+\frac{b}{\epsilon r }}

where d is the distance between plates of capacitor and b is the thickness of the slab.

If anyone could tell me is it correct, I would really appreciate it. :)
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top