Is This Stopping Distance Formula Accurate for Physics Projects?

  • Thread starter Thread starter NewDarkAge
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Formula
AI Thread Summary
The formula for stopping distance presented in the discussion, d = V^2/(2g(f + G)), is deemed valid, as it can be derived from standard equations of motion by considering the effects of friction and roadway grade. The relationship between braking distance, initial velocity, acceleration due to gravity, and the coefficient of friction is emphasized, with the suggestion that the formula can be adjusted for roadway grade. Important factors to consider for the poster include reaction time and the impact of wheel lockup on stopping distance. The discussion encourages careful attention to units and the range of validity for the equations used. Overall, the conversation provides a solid foundation for understanding the physics of stopping distances.
NewDarkAge
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hi

I'm doing a poster on stopping distances for Physics, but it's a topic we haven't really discussed yet in the lessons. In my research I found this formula:

"d = V^2/(2g(f + G))

Where:
d = Braking Distance
g = Acceleration due to gravity
G = Roadway grade as a percentage;
V = Initial vehicle speed
f = Coefficient of friction between the tires and the roadway"

I just wanted to check with you guys whether this is a valid formula as I haven't found it anywhere else. Also, I was wondering if you could give me any ideas for what to include in the poster; I'm really looking for formulae relating different factors that affect braking distance.

I hope this all makes sense, and thanks very much for your time

S
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The equation looks about right.

If you start with one of the standard equations of motion and ignore the grade you can get to this equation reasonably easily..

d = V2 /2gμ

where
d = stopping distance
V = Initial velocity
g = acc due to gravity
μ = coefficient of friction

Along the way you use:

force = mass * acceleration
and
friction force = Normal force * coefficient of friction
which is equivalent to
friction force = Mass * g * coefficient of friction

Note how the definition of coefficient of friction relates vertical to horizontal forces. So (without doing the maths) it's not unreasonable that u term might be modified by the grade which is also expressed as a ratio of vertical to horizontal.

Perhaps another person fancies doing the full proof for you.
 
You need to be careful to use the correct units in these equations and the range of validity (eg, G is derived from the small angle approximation of the sine of the grade). Have a look at the following document for a bit more detail ... https://engineering.purdue.edu/~flm/CE%20361_files/chapter1_2_notes_.pdf (around about Problem 2.21).

A couple of items to think about (depending upon what the intent of the poster is) are reaction time (If it takes you 1.5 seconds to react how far will the car travel before you even hit the brakes!) and wheel lockup (you want to skedaddle away from having an accident not skidaddle into one)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top