How Does Bohr's Atomic Model Address Electron Energy Loss?

AI Thread Summary
Bohr's atomic model addresses the issue of electron energy loss by introducing fixed orbits for electrons, which prevents them from continuously losing energy as predicted by classical electromagnetic theory. Unlike Rutherford's model, which failed to explain atomic stability, Bohr proposed that electrons occupy specific circular orbits with quantized energy levels. This means that electrons can only gain or lose energy in discrete amounts, corresponding to specific frequencies of emitted light. Consequently, the model accounts for the observed emission spectra of atoms, such as hydrogen, which only emits certain colors when excited. Ultimately, Bohr's model established a stable lowest energy state for electrons, eliminating the problem of continuous radiation emission.
Ahsan Khan
Messages
270
Reaction score
5
1[ Now in the 2nd year of b.tech I, since was in class 9th not understanding how Bohr modified the earlier Rutherford atomic model.It is known to me that Rutherford atomic model was failed because it could not satisfy the electromegnetic principle,according to which an elecltron continue to lose energy as it revolves around another charge(nucleus).Bhor modified the earlier model by stating each orbit with fixed orbit.I am not understanding when electromagnetic theory demands electron to continously lose energy,how then Bhor let the orbits of moving electron with fixed energy to explain the stability of atom.]



Homework Equations

no equations needed



The Attempt at a Solution

.I am not understanding when electromagnetic theory demands electron to continously lose energy,how then Bhor let the orbits of moving electron with fixed energy to explain the stability of atom.]
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If the electron was assumed to orbit the nucleus, that meant that the electron was experiencing an acceleration (since its velocity would always be changing). Because the electron was viewed as a wave, it had to shoot off waves in order to change direction and conserve momentum, and this means losing energy. In fact, this happens at particle accelerator labs like Fermilab and CERN; the accelerating particles give off X-rays.

This would mean that the electron could emit all sorts of different EM waves (different colors) corresponding to the amount of energy lost. But it was observed that (for example) the Hydrogen atom only emitted certain colors when excited. Bohr explained this by assuming only certain circular orbits were allowed, so that when the electron gained or lost energy it would always be the same energies (colors) being gained or lost.
 
Correcting merryjman: In the classical model of an atom the electron certainly was *not* seen as a wave. But an accelerating charge in classical theory should continuously emit radiation. An atom certainly doesn't do that.

The Bohr model explained that not only is light emitted only at certain frequencies, but there is also a lowest energy state in which the electron is stable and no longer emits any radiation.
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Thread 'Variable mass system : water sprayed into a moving container'
Starting with the mass considerations #m(t)# is mass of water #M_{c}# mass of container and #M(t)# mass of total system $$M(t) = M_{C} + m(t)$$ $$\Rightarrow \frac{dM(t)}{dt} = \frac{dm(t)}{dt}$$ $$P_i = Mv + u \, dm$$ $$P_f = (M + dm)(v + dv)$$ $$\Delta P = M \, dv + (v - u) \, dm$$ $$F = \frac{dP}{dt} = M \frac{dv}{dt} + (v - u) \frac{dm}{dt}$$ $$F = u \frac{dm}{dt} = \rho A u^2$$ from conservation of momentum , the cannon recoils with the same force which it applies. $$\quad \frac{dm}{dt}...
Back
Top