Conformal Mapping L to Sector: Find Angle α

latentcorpse
Messages
1,411
Reaction score
0
Let L:=\{z:|z-1|&lt;1\} \cap \{z:|z-i|&lt;1\}. Find a Mobius transformation that maps L onto the sector \{z: 0&lt; arg(z) &lt; \alpha \}. What is the angle \alpha?<br /> <br /> no idea of how about to set up the problem<br /> <br /> The intersection of the two circles forms a lens shaped region L with boundary curves, let&#039;s call them C_1 and C_2. <br /> <br /> i couldn&#039;t decide whether to write down a generic Mobius transformation f(z)=\frac{az+b}{cz+d} and try and work with it (this would need me to define stuff like points that map to zero and infinity though would it not) or to use the fact that Mobius transformations are combinations of inversions, dilations, rotations and translations and try and sipmlify the Mobius transformation this way?<br /> <br /> i need some explanation... <br /> <br /> cheers
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The key idea is to break it down into simple pieces. The basic "moves" you can do with a mobius map are translation, inversion, dilation, and rotation. You can read more about them here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mobius_transformation#Decomposition_and_elementary_properties

You need to string together a series of "moves" that will take the lens shape and map it to a region between 2 parallel lines.

The hard part, in my opinion, is how to map a circle to a line. The answer is to use the Mobius inversion f(z) = 1/z. Have a look at the following diagram from wikipedia to see what happens under an inversion (initial circle is blue, mapped "circle" is the green line, and the unit circle is red):
Inversion_illustration2.png
 
so 1/z will map the lens shaped region to a wedge then but how do we impose conditions such that one of the new lines lies along the positive real axis and the other lies alpha radians from the positive real axis?
 
translation and rotation
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top