Confused about Current Flow & Capacitances

AI Thread Summary
Current flow in electrochemical cells involves moving charge from a low potential to a high potential terminal, which establishes an electric potential difference. This flow is analogous to water moving from high to low elevation, but due to the negative charge of electrons, the actual movement is from the negative terminal to the positive terminal. The confusion arises from the historical choice of sign convention, where current is described as flowing from positive to negative, despite electrons moving in the opposite direction. In batteries, chemical reactions create a potential difference that allows stored energy to be released as current when terminals are connected. Understanding this concept clarifies the relationship between current flow and capacitance in electrical circuits.
D_DaYwAlKeR
Messages
20
Reaction score
0
I have some doubts regarding Current Flow and Capacitances...

I Read this somewhere..
" an electrochemical cell supplies energy to move a charge from its low energy, low potential terminal to the high energy, high potential terminal. In this sense, the cell supplies the energy to establish an electric potential difference across the two ends of the external circuit. Charge will then flow through the external circuit in the same manner that water will flow from an elevated position to a low position. It is the difference in potential that causes this flow..."


it says that charge (electron) will travel from Low potential to high potential...
then its says that it will move in the same manner that water will flow from an elevated position to a low position..( high potential to low potential...) ..i didnt get this at all..!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
D_DaYwAlKeR said:
it says that charge (electron) will travel from Low potential to high potential...
then its says that it will move in the same manner that water will flow from an elevated position to a low position..( high potential to low potential...) ..i didnt get this at all..!

It's just a matter of a sign convention, because electrons are said to have negative charge. Life would be a lot easier if a century and a half ago we had decided to call the electron's charge "positive" instead of "negative" so that they would naturally move from areas of high "positive" charge to low "positive" charge - but back then we didn't know which direction the physical charge carriers were moving, and arbitrarily chose a sign convention that turns out to be inconvenient for talking about electrons.

To this day we take power from the positive terminal of a battery, and talk about the wiring diagram as if electrical current is flowing "downhill" from the positive terminal; but what's actually happening physically is that electrons are flowing "uphill" from the negative terminal.
 
I got it nw...

Electron loses potential energy as it moves from low potential to high potenital..!...thnxx...@Nugatory!
 
I believe the beginning they are talking about a chemical battery; it talks about moving the charge from a low energy state to a high energy state.

In a battery, a chemical reaction supplies the energy to separate the charges between the cathode and anode, which causes an electrical potential difference across the terminals and puts the charges into a high potential energy state. When the terminals are connected by a conductor, the stored energy is releases as current. And as Nugatory said, the convention is to label the current as flowing from positive to negative.
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
It may be shown from the equations of electromagnetism, by James Clerk Maxwell in the 1860’s, that the speed of light in the vacuum of free space is related to electric permittivity (ϵ) and magnetic permeability (μ) by the equation: c=1/√( μ ϵ ) . This value is a constant for the vacuum of free space and is independent of the motion of the observer. It was this fact, in part, that led Albert Einstein to Special Relativity.
Back
Top