How Should Gravity Be Signed in Kinematic Equations?

  • Thread starter Thread starter erok81
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Confused Gravity
AI Thread Summary
In the discussion, a user seeks clarification on how to properly assign signs to gravity in kinematic equations when calculating the height of a package dropped from an ascending helicopter. The initial velocity is set as +15 m/s, indicating upward motion, while gravity is correctly assigned a negative value of -9.8 m/s² due to its downward direction. The importance of maintaining consistent sign conventions based on the chosen coordinate system is emphasized, particularly in determining whether the final position is above or below the origin. The user realizes that a negative distance indicates the package is below the initial release point, while a positive value would represent height above ground when the ground is set as the origin. Ultimately, the user gains a clearer understanding of how to interpret the signs in their calculations.
erok81
Messages
454
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



A package is dropped from a helicopter moving upwards at 15 m/. If it takes 25.0s before the package hits the ground, how high above the ground was the package when it was released. Disregard air resistance.

Homework Equations



I used this kinematic equation

s_f=s_i +v_i t + 1/2 a (t)^2

The Attempt at a Solution



So I set it up with the initial velocity being +15m/s since it is going up and the gravity as -9.80m/s^2 as it is going down.

Here is my question. Is that right? I am completely lost when it comes to g being positive or negative. I understand you use whichever sign coresponds to your setup directions. But in this case I end up with -2688. Do I just disregard the sign on the distance? Or is could it be negative because my set up states the package was released on the x-axis so technically the end position is negative because it's below the axis? So in that case I do change the sign?

I figure this is pretty important to figure out as it can have a major effect on the outcome of these problems.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If your velocity is +, then g must be negative in that equation. You shouldn't be getting a negative number though. When you do vt-1/2at^2 you get a negative number, but remember that here, your s_f is 0 and you're solving for s_i not the other way around (so you have to bring everything to the other side).
 
Using +15 m/s is right if you specify "up" as the positive direction. Once you do that, you must be consistent with the other vector quantities. You must use a = - 9.8 m/s2 because the acceleration of gravity is "down".

It is also important to specify your origin with respect to which you measure distances. If you say si = 0, then your origin is the initial position of the package and you should expect sf to be a negative number (below the origin). If you say sf = 0 (i.e. you assume that your origin is the ground) and solve for si, then you should expect a positive number (above ground).

You should not change any sign, but you should interpret the sign that you get on the basis of your assumptions about which way is "up" and where your origin is.
 
Ahhhhh I get it! :bugeye:

And now that your two explained it and I read the question again, I see why my answer was negative but the actual answer isn't.

I found from the helo down, which is negative 2688, but I need from the ground to the helo which is positive once I switch things around.

I thought I had it but then did this problem and was lost again.

Now that I have these explanations, I understand it 100%.

Thank you
 
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Back
Top